English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

As far as I know, the only "experience" Mrs. Clinton has so far, is traveling with ex-president Clinton as a first lady. Frankly, that and nothing are almost the same. Any former president's wife is "qualified to run" if that is ever a criteria to judge executive experience for a presidential candidate.

On the other hand, what specific "leadership" actions has she ever undertaken, during her public service? What bills or proposals of her have ever been approved as a law, and what influence have they made on the country?

IMHO, she's not any more "experienced" than Obama.

But character-wise, she really is damaged goods, in comparison: She is super-unlikable, stuck-up and arrogant, sounds and acts like she only wants to prove that "she's better than any man". On top of that, she is not honest and straightforward at all, rather she's a hypocrite, who supports and votes for things when it is convenient.

Is getting most of the female votes her only reason to maybe win the elections?

2007-11-28 07:21:01 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Elections

22 answers

I think the female voters will cow-tow behind Oprah now and vote for Obama... (well the most easily influenced women of course)...
I have lived in NY for 9 years now and I have yet to benefit from anything that Hillary has supposedly done for this state... trust me I have never voted for her for senator either...
the only "experience" she has is from being a first wife and that is why she never left the lying cheater...
she also is more polarizing than her husband...
this country does not need someone to be polarizing at this point in history...
She has been under attack(and rightfully so) from Republicans for so long because she just dodges everything... does anyone know her plan for anything?
I don't understand how anyone could support her, especially since she is the total opposite of her husband...

2007-11-28 07:28:49 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

I don't know why it was removed either, since this question has been asked numerous times now. Substitute the word " average" for " typical". The average white person, or typical, in the 40's and 50's had some very different attitudes that we have now , 68 years later. That's all he meant. People are trying to read way too much into anything that comes out of the man's mouth. I'm amazed that people are not more concerned about his stance on gun control, or global warming, or immigration. Those are not " typical" or " average" issues. Really, though, is it so important that you would have your account suspended?

2016-05-26 05:52:33 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

Dumbass??? Whats with that, typical of anyone that questions her. Just a hater. I read all the polls and always wonder where they come up with the numbers on her. I can't find anyone that is or will vote for her. She has no real experience that would qualify her to be president of this great country. I do think it's time for a female president, but not her. Her and her other half do nothing but lie and cheat. That is a fact. Now I'll turn this back over to you name callers and haters.

2007-11-28 07:31:10 · answer #3 · answered by cancun1313 4 · 4 0

She has no experience. Either does Obama. The only way you could have experience is to have already been the president once. As far as those who say she "contributed" to government, how? Casting a vote? She used the people of NY to get into the government, abused her powers there, made no specific changes or helped the people of NY in any way, and now running for president, on a campaign that has her husband flip flopping on decisions they already made is a pretty poor example of what choices we have for our next president.

Shame Bill has to make himself look more stupid than he already has by trying to pump up her campaign. We all make choices in life, and WE have to stick by those choices. Why don't our candidates have to stick by theres? Sounds like a double standard to me.

2007-11-28 07:31:14 · answer #4 · answered by DJ S 2 · 4 0

I heard someone say: "I was the CEO of (such and such business) for ten years. Does that make my wife qualified to run the company? NO!"

The bulk of the experience she refers to is her manipulation and subjugation of reality. Her commensurate experience covering up, intimidating and snaking out of inconvenient circumstances is quite an achievement, I must say. How can a couple involved in so much scandal and dirty business still be held in high esteem in the eyes of the American public, and EVER be considered to 'rule' from our nations highest office?! The people that are considering voting for her must either have ulterior motives for placing her in office or just be completely stupid, delusional or insane.

2007-11-28 07:32:16 · answer #5 · answered by faerieshy 3 · 4 0

Congress holder?? (whitninj? who's the dumbass?? ) She was a Jr Senator in NY (my state) where she did absolutely nothing but campaign to become president... She has done nothing and is about the least qualified candidate in both parties. Why do you think the republicans keeps her name in the news? She will be the easiest to defeat.

2007-11-28 07:45:18 · answer #6 · answered by Ditka 7 · 4 0

Your statements are quite strong and I happen to agree with you...although she would like you to think that her first ladyship was "experience"...and if you read or listen to any of her former employees or Bill's, descriptions of her, your head would spin!
I remember her "failed" healthcare remedies in Bill's early years...she does not seem to want to talk about that...she wont get this female's vote!

2007-11-28 07:28:06 · answer #7 · answered by Christiane 3 · 6 0

She's been lied to by Bill more than any other American, except maybe his Mom...and she plans on using that experience to sell the US public a bill of goods that no one wants.

2007-11-28 07:24:08 · answer #8 · answered by Yahoo Answer Angel 6 · 5 1

you can put the experience of these two together and it still doesn't add up to the experience joe biden has. 35 years in the senate, chair of the senate foreign relations committee, hillary already endorsed him - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7yNvFLRvNK4 - joe biden is the only candidate the republicans can't take down. go to http://www.joebiden.com/home and read his positions. also check out his youtube channel - http://www.youtube.com/user/JoeBidendotcom and hear more from senator biden.

2007-11-28 10:36:22 · answer #9 · answered by ? 6 · 1 1

Miss,
Hillary Clinton lives in a little world of her own; (that changes constantly depending on who she is addressing) If you ever manage to make sense out of anything she says please let the rest of us know.

2007-11-28 07:26:59 · answer #10 · answered by benjamin 2 · 6 0

fedest.com, questions and answers