2007-11-28 06:45:19 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Perhaps you would like to explain the differences and pose a question ?
I realize I do not need the word 'massive' in all caps to understand it means 'substantial'.
2007-11-28 06:50:04 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Franklin D. Roosevelt was a peace time AND a war time president. The only difference is that there is a state of war going on WHILE they are president. Your question's premise falls apart easily, because it is simply wrong.
2007-11-28 14:49:45 · answer #2 · answered by Paul Hxyz 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
You DO realize of course, there is a MASSIVE difference between a war and this vaguely defined quagmire
2007-11-28 14:54:13 · answer #3 · answered by captain_koyk 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Please elucidate and provide links to sources for this opinion. I will grant you there is a difference, but it would be nice to see just how many rights you think we should give up in the name of "security". Plus, since it was a war of choice in Iraq, I am not so sure I want to give him the benefit of it being "wartime", if it indeed there is a "benefit".
2007-11-28 14:51:57 · answer #4 · answered by Slimsmom 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
And there is a big difference between a good President and a bad one. Whether we are at war or peace, Bush is just horrid.
2007-11-28 14:49:26 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
Disagree. President is President regardless. Bush is not a good person to be leading our country.
2007-11-28 14:52:40 · answer #6 · answered by gone 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
No i do not agree. One who is elected president should be able to be either kind as we do not know what holds tommorow.
2007-11-28 14:48:45 · answer #7 · answered by ♥ Mel 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Bush was elected during peacetime and wanted to be a wartime President.
That worked out well for him!
2007-11-28 14:50:03 · answer #8 · answered by Kelly B 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Yes their is [thank God] Bill Clinton and George W. Bush.
Clinton would only have told Monica,"Gollie,looky there."
2007-11-28 14:52:39 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
True...but Bush chose to go to war....he can live with the consequences.
2007-11-28 14:49:41 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋