Do you think it's fair that your former wife can get half of everything you own...She never had a job.?

Question

I don't think it's fair that women can cut and run when they feel like it, and collect major money in the process. I'm one of those people that thinks marrage doesn't work, because men can't be with one person for the rest of there lives...it's just not possible. Men need to see and feel something new on a regular basis, and most wifes won't let other women into the bedroom. ( it would truly help if they did ) Plus, women that just expect gifts and other crap, make me sick, but it's no shock that 99% expect gifts and crap.

My ex quit when I told her to stay at her VERY GOOD JOB!!!! SHe made her own way until she met me.

no kids. she has none and either do i

blue Flower give women EVERYWHERE A BAD NAME. I hope a man ***** you up. *****.

I didn't cheat. I just work, work, work. I'm on about 7 redbulls now.

Answer 1

yeah, I am glad she took you to the cleaners.... that's what you get!!!!

Answer 2

Should women get half of everything you on whether they work or not?

Well I'm a single woman who's never been married, but my opinion is all depends. If the husband did something to cause the divorce like cheating, abuse, or anything that was over 60% his fault then yeah. If you didn't do those things there probably wouldn't be a divorce. So in my opinion if a man is the one at fault for the marriage ending and if you were the major provider why should she loose everything, so yes she should get everything you own and more. Now if it was the other way around and she was the one at fault but you were still the major provider, I say hell naw I think she should get a job real soon. If kids are involved whoever doesn't get custody of the kids should pay child support, but spousal support depends on who had the majority of fault in ending the marriage. I know if I was married and was the one making the money supporting him, but he cheated I'm not giving him nothing. Especially if all he did was sit on his butt.

Answer 3

As a guy, that doesn't want to get married. I'm telling you that sometimes is fair. When the person has been loyal and has given job opportunities and a career to raise the children and let the man work, she can do it, but that's how the couple has organized themselves, whatever happens, gain or loses, is shared between both. There are woman who take advantage of this and they end up having and making themselves an easy life without many efforts and partying all day long, it's hard for the men, they basically become victims, but the good thing, is that men can choose to be a victim or not, and that only depends on the man, in nobody else. Life is great, it's pointless to warry if the system is fair or not, there are woman like that, and are man that will be their victims, in which group a man wants to be?, is his choice.

Answer 4

You already know what the right thing to do is. You think Claire's baby is not yours, but you don't know, and you think Krystka's baby is yours, but you don't know that, either. There are four possibilities: 1. both Claire's and Krystka's babies are yours. 2. you are not the father of either baby. 3. Claire's baby is yours, but not Krystka's. 4. Krystka's baby is yours, but not Claire's. Usually, things like health benefits and coverage are decided somewhere in the divorce settlement. Didn't you and Claire have some kind of agreement on that? If you did, then you should honor that agreement. If you don't and it's recorded in the divorce agreement, Claire is right in what she told you. One thing for sure, Claire's baby is at least 1/2 sibling to your kids. Krystka's baby may not be related to them at all (if you're not the father). Claire must have thought that you had a solid agreement that she would be covered under your health plan, at least until the baby was delivered. She doesn't seem like the type of person who, especially being pregnant, would take a leave of absence and not keep her insurance, if she thought she wasn't covered. Like everyone else who comes into the United States, legally or illegally, Krystka will be covered, anyway. Who's to say she won't have outstanding medical care? You do what you think is right. You're the one who will have to live with your decision. I'm just offering you some tidbits to think over.

Answer 5

Half would be bad enough but they ( women ) get much more than half. They get half right off the bat, before the lawyers and the judges get involved. Then they want more. They want alimoney, they want a piece of your pension, they want a piece of money you havn't earned yet, they want money and holdings you worked your butt off to acquire before you ever met her.

The man will be ordered to pay her court fees. You, the man, will pay her lawyer for cutting off your balls.

GOD HELP YOU if there are children involved. Unless the woman is a real "horror show" or actually does not want the kids, she will get primary custody almost automatically. Now she will not only be in your pocket for the next 20 years, she will have control of the most important thing in the world, your children. Then for 20 years or so, she will not hesitate to use your love for them to cause you unimmagined heartache.

How would you like every conversation to start with, " if you want to see the kids then bla bla bla" or unless bla bla bla you wont see the kids this Christmas.

I hope all you guys out there between 16 and 60 read this very carefully.

Answer 6

you may not think it's fair, but it works both ways. If the woman makes all the income in the marriage and the man stays home, he can cut and run also then sue for alimony. also you are making a lot of broad statements about men there, you should speak just for yourself. I know a LOT of men (such as my grandfather) who are very happy to be with one person their whole life. granted he was more mature & already had been around the block a few times so when he got married he was ready to settle down. plus it's not impossible to feel newness within a marriage...it can be as easy as a new position, new skimpy outfit, acting out a new fantasy... about most women not allowing another women in the bedroom..you may be right about that. for my part, I am the one who wants to swing (have both women AND men in our bedroom) and my husband says no. yes women want gifts, like on Valentine's day and Christmas. most husbands want them too. sounds like you are not mature enough to be in a relationship, best for you to stick to a blow-up doll and not make some poor woman miserable..

Answer 7

That's funny. I'm a man, and I've been with the same woman my entire life. Happily married. Looks like your generalization is wrong. Excuses, excuses. Besides, you don't even have the legal side to this right. Women DON'T get to run off with half your stuff in most states, because most states have no-fault divorce laws. The only exception is when there are kids involved, but then it is all about the kids, not the woman. Besides, you can always get a prenuptial if you are concerned with someone taking all your stuff. Sounds like your argument doesn't have a leg to stand on.

Your loss. Oh well. The women you disrespect will get the last laugh when you are old, disease-ridden, and alone. That is what happens to guys like you. Good luck!

Answer 8

Marriage is all about give and take, sometimes it's even, sometimes it's one sided, but in the end, it's all about compromise. You must have had a really bad upbringing or a bad marriage to be so cynical and cruel.

The compromise in the bedroom should be for each other, however, if you want more women in the bedroom, you should offer to have more men there too. Fair is fair, if you don't want to give gifts, don't, just don't expect much in return either.

You get what you give.

Answer 9

the equitable distribution laws are the reason that marriage should be a very big decision. Many people take it too lightly, and they end up losing everything they own. However, i do not agree with the one person for the rest of your life statement you made. If you truely love someone, and make a good decision on a marriage, then i fully believe that it is possible to maintain fidelity a marriage.

If you want to sleep around, then either marry someone who is a swinger, or remain single. Marriage is a choice, and bad choices lead to bad outcomes.

Answer 10

You need to find a good man. Not all women are like that. Yes if we have been married for years and cooked,cleaned,raised your children,and did you laundry and others not to mention yes we deserve half. If a couple was only married for a few years then No the woman shouldn't get half. I was one of those women when I was married to my first husband where my husband did not want me to work and was a mother of a 2 year old. I cooked, I cleaned and did all the wifey things until one day he decided to leave me for another woman. We did not have anything so there was nothing to half. I had to start from scratch with a 2 year old while he went out and wined and dined this new lady. If he had good money then yes I would of fought for half.

Answer 11

I've been reading your vitriol towards and generalizations about women in your various posts. With such a negative attitude toward women, you never should have gotten married. Hell, you don't think you can be with one person for the rest of your life, yet you got married?!! What were you thinking?!!

Given your misogyny, you are in no position to objectively analyze what women are entitled to in a divorce. Say you work outside the home but your wife is a stay at home mom. In event of a divorce, you think she should be left penniless?