If I'm a Republican Senator what is my view on this:
Should national security issues be outside the realm of ethics and differentiated from the issues that arise concerning privacy in a commercial setting such as your place of employment?
We are allowed to do research and this is also based on well educated opinions. Serious answers only. Thank you.
2007-11-27 23:53:24 · 3 answers · asked by Michelle 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Many Republican Senators take a range of wide stances when it comes to the realm of ethics, so is not fair to stereotype them.
2007-11-28 10:46:44 · answer #1 · answered by Barry C 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
While the subject of ethics can be gray and argued at great length. It is the lack of ethics that have brought about some of the greatest involvement of the government in to business. For example, and I will probably not get the correct titles, the environmental health agency, OSHA, Sarbanes-Oxley. These were created to watch over businesses/industries that could not find the ethical fortitude to do the right thing. How about the labor unions? Weren't they initial created to support workers of unethical businesses? To improve wages and working conditions? I know they have strayed from their original purpose, but they did have a somewhat noble purpose in the beginning. Ethics does not have to play in to business at all. But, if companies don't feel the need to act responsibly, they can just wait and have another governmental agency watch over them.
2016-05-26 05:05:25 · answer #2 · answered by bobby 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wars are declared so that the politicians can earn from the manufacture and sale of weapons.
2007-11-28 00:58:52 · answer #3 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋