Is this another example of the BBC's propaganda?

Question

The BEEB has posted this statement in the news.

"Muhammad, in its 14 different spellings, is now the second most popular name for baby boys in Britain."

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/7115821.stm

Yet other sources such as the Telegraph give a more accurate rundown of the UK's most popular boys names.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/12/21/nnames21.xml

Is this another show of fear towards islam from the BBC?

Is this news to the people of the uk?

Joey M. Now show evidence from your own sorces that Mo is the second most popular boys name in the UK.
Put your money where your mouth is.

Answer 1

Strange, isn't it, the beeb's trainspotterish fascination with Islam. I mean there are Bhuddists, Hindus, all different religions in the country but when do you see them on the telly ? So much for multiculturism !!

Answer 2

I don't think it is really, I read both and the BBC article has barely anything to do with Muhammad being used as a babies name, where as the other is literally an article on baby boys names that relates to Muhammad.

I would say that it is more an over-exaggerated cover sentence than anti-Islam propaganda. Although it is quite a big exaggeration. The article mentions 14 different spellings where as the other only counts two in its survey so maybe if you counted all the spellings (if there really are that many, if thats wrong then its just ignorance by the BBC) then maybe it would be the second most popular name.

Answer 3

i do no longer locate the BBC to be extremely biased, under no circumstances particularly in direction of the Conservatives and Lib Dems. except you come across out which events all applicants for jobs interior the corporate have voted for, and hire an equivalent volume of voters for each occasion (which does no longer basically be a contravention of their suitable to a private vote, besides the undeniable fact that it would probably stand interior the way of the superb human beings getting the jobs, meaning a deterioration in standards), there'll continually be a bias interior the political ideals of individuals who artwork on the BBC (people who prefer jobs interior the media have a tendency to be greater probable to lean to the left). besides the undeniable fact that, i think of the BBC is amazingly huge wakeful of this, and is often attempting to stay away from expressing bias. in case you have any data of the BBC manipulating data to help a undeniable schedule, then I (and Ofcom) might fairly prefer to work out it. yet i think of that somebody has to rfile on politics, through fact otherwise how will human beings comprehend what's taking place? Are you going to shrink political reporting to the newspapers (that are, of path, notoriously independent (!))? a minimum of the BBC tries to modern a balanced and certainty-based version of politics, it fairly is greater effective than would nicely be suggested for many information shops.

Answer 4

On the face of it, you seem to have a point. However, be aware that you are not comparing like with like. This is because the BBC is aggregating all the different spellings (Muhammad, Mohammed and so on) into one, whereas the Telegraph's table treats each spelling variant as a different name. Therefore, the BBC's ranking would necessarily, and correctly, be higher overall than the Telegraph's.

Answer 5

Check out the dates of the two reports first. Your first source is from 2006 and second from 2007.

Shows you what immigration levels are like and how many pregnant muslims are fleeing muslim countries for a western standard of living and who can blame them when they can be punished for such ridiculous things as naming of a toy or for being raped.

Answer 6

It proves that the Government has no Idea how their uncontrolled Immigration policies are changing the face of Britain and being repopulated by stealth.To think that our politicians are lulling us into a false sense of inaction so that they may keep their vote banks and maintain their positions in Government. What a farce. The only surprise here is that it is happening so fast.

Answer 7

But the BBC are combining 14 variants of the name and the Daily Telegraph are only combining two - so obviously their order will be different

Answer 8

Well, its hardly news. Propaganda & manipulation of people's fears is what the media are FOR.
I must admit I'm having trouble coming up with 14 spellings of Muhammad though.

Answer 9

Yes. It is newsworthy. The implications are obvious and the reporting is not biased in anyway. Moreover, Muslims do spell that name in many different ways.

Do you think that maybe they should hush up this fact so as to not seemingly offend Muslims by reporting it?

Give me a break, cry baby.

Answer 10

I think that they probably just got their facts wrong. Common sense should have told them this, but the beeb ain't what it used to be.