candidates are against an amnesty, how will that effect Democrat candidates in the polls?
2007-11-27 13:38:04 · 9 answers · asked by a bush family member 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I do believe most of the country wants action on illegals, But i also think most all politicians are staying away from the issue as much as possible.
You name a guy who will stand up and say he'll order enforcement and you will be naming the next president.
2007-11-27 13:49:48 · answer #1 · answered by SFC_Ollie 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Most Republicans are not really against amnesty, unless you only look at what they talk about recently. If you look into their past, you will only find 3 that are consistently against it. Duncan Hunter, Tom Tancredo, and Ron Paul, the latter being ahead of many in polls, money and bi-partisan support. All the Democratic candidates are for some form of Amnesty, which really should tell you something. Many of the most well known, are also pro-war. Those two facets of some of the issues this time around, are two of the biggest problems right now.
2007-11-27 14:03:15 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Depends, I guess. I am a Democrat, and I am specifically interested in candidates who will *not* endorse the North American Union (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_Union), who will deport illegal aliens, build the fence and fine employers who knowingly entice illegals for cheap labor.
-----------
Edit: Fred Thompson is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations -- along with other current candidates. The CFR endorses the North American Union.
http://www.faithspeak.net/profiles/blog/show?id=647506%3ABlogPost%3A4931
2007-11-27 13:42:29 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
there are approximately 11 million unlawful hispanics right here, and given the form of deportations consistent with 12 months, that's gonna be a protracted time in the previous all of them are out. in spite of who will become president, we are no longer gonna see all illegals in this u . s . a . out via 2016. hint: i comprehend some thing the anti-illegals do no longer and that i visit being keen to proportion what that's only by means of email no longer on YA. i could be reached by means of YA reason my handle is obtainable for persons to respond.
2016-11-12 22:45:15 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
There are 2 Republicans who are NOT for Amnesty...please check them out
Duncan Hunter and Fred Thompson.
2007-11-27 13:42:57 · answer #5 · answered by Sparxfly 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Well, Laura, I wouldn't put too much faith in hot button issues this time around. People are waking up to the hypocrisy of the republican party and I think not enough people will vote on just one issue to give you either a Reagan or Bush-lite victory.
Best hope: the supremes can get a shot again.
2007-11-27 13:47:43 · answer #6 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Immigration is not the only issue to base or judge a candidate.
They are more important issues than Immigration like Economy, housing crisis, employment healthcare, jobs, values,
2007-11-27 13:44:31 · answer #7 · answered by Max V 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
ABFM,
How about a solution, combining the majority of the illegals issue ( There WILL NEVER be a solution whereby ALL illegal aliens are deported), AND solving our own political problem's.
DEPORT THE ILLEGALS AND ALL - (that's right ALL) ALL OF OUR POLITICIANS, TOGETHER !!!!!!!
IF THEY ARE IN OFFICE, """" VOTE THE SORRY BASTAR*S OUT """""!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2007-11-28 03:34:30 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It will be rough going for them. That's a big hurdle to overcome.
2007-11-27 13:41:27 · answer #9 · answered by Erinyes 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋