Work on your language skills a little. This barely makes sense.
In answer to the question, though, the Flyer's are not a real contender, I don't think, dirty or not dirty. For one thing, I am not sold on their goaltending. Marty Biron has not done a thing to indicate he is ready to take a team to the Cup. No amount of gooning or not gooning is going to change that fact.
2007-11-27 12:17:28
·
answer #1
·
answered by Mr. Taco 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
I agree with Bill, last year the Ducks were considered dirty and it didn't seem to hurt them. Gives all the whiners something to talk about if nothing else.
Last I checked, the Flyers were (are) seeded 3rd in the East, thus making them a contender.
2007-11-27 21:15:11
·
answer #2
·
answered by Bob Loblaw 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
This is very wierd......im watchin the Flames & Red Wings ply right now. And during intermission ;they wer discussing that very question. Not one commentator said that they were a dirty team. They showed all of the hits they made in injuring
other plyers. THAT`S HOCKEY. If you don`t want to compete here;play ping-pong or tennis. Football is not for wimps; & niether is Hockey! AS far as the Flyers being in contention--
EVERY-ONES in contention. The Stanley Coup isn`t till June or July.
2007-11-27 20:41:31
·
answer #3
·
answered by john g 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Two questions.
1) The Ducks weren't exactly Lady Byng candidates on their way to the Cup last year. Do you think they were dirty?
2) Where's Simon Gagne?
2007-11-27 20:51:34
·
answer #4
·
answered by Awesome Bill 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
i dont really think the ducks were dirty bob, despite the pronger antics they were hardhitting and fighters, but not really dirty
i saw the telecast too of the wings flames
i kindof agree with the telecaster that they were some closely spaced stupid instances . . . although i really sont think the bergeron one was that bad
2007-11-28 04:37:15
·
answer #5
·
answered by bourgoise_10o 5
·
0⤊
0⤋