Do U think in terms of a unique point solution or a unique range of solutions to every moral/ethical problem?

Question

Please explain as concisely and coherently as you can the difference between point and range of solutions. (((hint: Analogies or illustration by example may be useful or necessary.)))

This is an ethics Q. Actually it is a metaethics Q! And yes, I have a position on the issue, but I want to know your opinion,your thinking, on the topic of what exactly is a "solution." This is doing real philosophy!

Answer 1

Problem solving is made easier with logical methodologies. This could include mathematical theorems, political philosophies, financial strategies, religions, etc.
However, there is a difference between a heuristic approach and a heuristic solution. Correct solutions often have gray areas that create unique categories. I could use the same computer to solve all problems but that does not make the problems fit into singular categories.

Answer 2

lf l had my way l could tax the hell out of homeowners and exterminate all undesirable canine.canine may be expensive to vendors yet to the rest human beings that's a stressful nuesense.once you think approximately that there is not any longer something by any potential to income from pets for the regular public.They compete with guy for foodstuff sheter and vet costs. in contrast to farm animals they produce 0 benefit to the regular public.All we might desire to continually coach is canine mess on our pavements, consistent noise from barking, and relentless worry from assaults.and all that for what?