English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

before you answer think about it. they both lied to the people they governed. they both started a world war (think about how many countrys were involved in this current war) they both spied on there own people. they both had camps were they tourtured and killed numerous people

2007-11-27 09:02:54 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Government

In response to some of the answers I have got I whould like to state my political affiliation. I am not a Nazi and I don't support Fascim. Please do not label me as a Nazi or a Fascist directly or in directly.
I tend to agree with Ayn Rands views about Objectivism

2007-11-27 10:11:48 · update #1

17 answers

Um, is there a third choice? Please!??!

2007-11-27 09:06:55 · answer #1 · answered by Barb Outhere 7 · 1 3

LOL you're kidding right? George Bush Jr. No contest.

Hitler did more than LIE
he gained power by "using propaganda and charismatic oratory, emphasizing nationalism, anti-semitism and arrest and murder of political opponents.." Here read up on Adolf Hitler

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hitler

Ask any Jew over the age of 60 that same question... I dare you. Especially a German Jew.

I lived by a gentleman that lived in Norway during Hitler's tyranny. He had to stay locked up in his house for 30 DAYS with nothing to eat but chicken broth and bread. 30 DAYS!!!
One of his friends tried to leave his house and the Nazi soldiers guarding their town shot him on sight!

Here you should also read up on Ann Frank... You know the Jewish little girl who died at age 12 living in an attic trying to hide from the Nazi's http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ann_Frank

I'm disguseted that the media has been able to get away with this propaganda regarding Bush. Regardless of weather or not you agree with George Bush (Jr) I would be careful of making these kind of comparisons to ANY leader of a free nation. They are very serious allegations to make on someone.

Remember when you soil our president's name to the international community you are also soiling the Country's name to the international community. No man and no Country is perfect and has it's problems. However, to compare Bush to someone as horrific as Hitler is a serious offense.

You should learn to read your facts on people before making such wild accusations. It makes anything you say afterwards less creditable.

2007-11-27 17:38:43 · answer #2 · answered by RockStarinTx 3 · 2 1

i believe george bush is a horrible president, yes.

but please, enlighten me-- where are these camps you speak of that bush had where he tortured and killed numerous people?

are you referencing guatanamo bay or something?

if you are: yes, that was horrendous. and still, i don't believe you can truly compare that to the concentration camps that specifically targeted jews (as well as other minorities). 6 million jews died, because of this persuasive man's hate! it's an entirely different scale.

to equate the two is an injustice and illustrates a lack of respect.

so to answer your question, i would rather have george bush be president than hitler thank you very much.

2007-11-27 17:09:12 · answer #3 · answered by Answer 2 · 3 0

Before you ask this question, think about it: You lied about Bush starting a world war (the war was started by the people who attacked us, and the people who supported them), you lied about the spying (insofar as the scope that you give it), & you lied about Bush' people torturing and murdering people.

2007-11-27 17:09:18 · answer #4 · answered by †Lawrence R† 6 · 2 0

Oh please your such an idiot. Hitler didn't govern he controlled. We are not in a world war at all. The only spying that was done was on our enemies who would try and kill us. I guess you don't care if Americans get killed and our government could have stopped it. You really don't know anything about what Hitler did, do you fool.

2007-11-27 17:59:43 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

phew. Just when I was starting to get embarrassed to be a Republican, you remind me that the Democrats have their fair share of idiot nut jobs too.

Don't you realize that comparing Bush to Hitler is just going to make people realize that Bush isn't as bad as the Democrats think he is?

2007-11-27 17:07:23 · answer #6 · answered by daniel 4 · 4 0

Adolf Hitler because he reached for the world and couldn't get it because the world is now unabtainable. He was a very smart man and Bush is an ignorant politician taking away our civil liberties when atleast Germany loved Hitler and tried to get them out of thier debt to the world but trying to conquer the world.

2007-11-27 17:08:26 · answer #7 · answered by Tony V 1 · 0 5

Every day, I thank the Lord that my sanity and intelligence preclude me from asking questions like this!

2007-11-27 17:06:04 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Tough choice - criminally insane; or criminally incompetent?
Bush, I guess... I don't speak German, and I'd rather be stupid than insane.

2007-11-29 22:01:31 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It is a shame that so many people believe like you do.

2007-11-27 18:02:45 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

hitler, but his propoganda abilities are much better than bush's and no he was as honest as bush. besides they both want to better the world by there standards and hitler was a looney. i'd rather follow a looney then a fool. I'm not degrading hitler by calling him crazy, he was brilliant but his mind was skewed by my standards.

2007-11-27 17:12:54 · answer #11 · answered by Hoovermaster 3 · 0 4

fedest.com, questions and answers