to cut the number of managers in a hospital,hire more cleaners/nurses/doctors etc
2007-11-27 08:56:11 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
bop it - i have to defend my fellow cooks in the nhs,the food is only as good as the hospital buys
2007-11-27 09:03:12 · update #1
yes you have a good point,it would save a lot of money as well.
2007-11-27 09:00:26 · answer #1 · answered by Spot 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Most definitely not. Firstly the number of managers would not be cut very much, rather on the workers at the bottom end like cleanres would be first be cut in numbers. And, as we have seen with other previously state owned companies that have been "privatized", even with staff on high level, like doctors and nurses, which it is all about to provide a good service there will be "economising".
I am not a resident in Britain, but it is to my knowledge the only western European country that has an institution like the NHS providing free medical help for everybody. Keep it that way, you are still in a very privileged situation.
2007-11-27 17:13:47 · answer #2 · answered by les75 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The NHS is run as a business, just not very well.
There are too many chiefs and not enough indians.
I have been saying for a long time to bring back matrons as they used to be. They ruled the wards with a rod of iron but hospitals were clean and mrsa was never heard of.
2007-11-27 17:48:23 · answer #3 · answered by northern lass 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Parts of the NHS tried that. It doesn't work!!
It would no longer be the National Health Service if it went private.
A rather futile statement/question to make!!
2007-11-27 17:17:00 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Desperate measures need to be taken but on improvement in what's already in place. I spend a good deal of the year in another European country, their medical care can be second to none but boy to they need to pay for it? I know from working just how much we pay to our NHS in contributions but believe me getting the PROPER private care can be a real costly business elsewhere.
2007-11-27 20:17:48 · answer #5 · answered by Ms Mat Urity 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it needs to be run by people that care. right now , no one cares. ok sorry i know the doctors and nurses care, but the bosses, the NHS in general do not care about individuals. they care about numbers, money and targets. the poor patient is bottom of the list of priorities.
2007-11-27 17:29:40 · answer #6 · answered by kati 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
no because the private company/business who runs might go out of business and people will have to pay for healthcare
with the NHS people get free health care that cannot go out of business because it is paid for by taxes
2007-11-27 17:02:28 · answer #7 · answered by catssunsetsmusic 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The cleaning side of it is already and some would say their poor work style helps propagate MRSA and C-dif.... etc.,
But it would I suspect be a licence to print money for the private medical business. So my answer would be NO!
2007-11-27 17:10:19 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i work in the nhs.nurses,doctors,admin workers,managers,domestics,porters is what is the nhs.whats needed is the nhs to be run by nhs workers who give a damn,not people making bonuses as to how many people are seen
2007-11-27 17:04:40 · answer #9 · answered by chas c 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
On this side of the puddle, a movie called "Sicko", by Michael Moore, has acheived some notoriety. You may wish to visit his website, or rent a copy. It pertains to your question.
2007-11-27 17:06:24 · answer #10 · answered by A Guy 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No.people cant afford medical bills should we be a nation where we have poorly people because the world is greedy for money?no i dont think so.
2007-11-27 17:06:56 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋