I am thinking so because I know that the longer a woman does it the more harder it will be for her child to let go when she stops. I mean I know its good for bonding but I am just thinking what will make it easier on him in the long run, you know? I am just curious to know what others think.
2007-11-27 08:02:19 · 21 answers · asked by Little Angel 1 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
I think it should be stopped before age 2
2007-11-27 08:05:54 · answer #1 · answered by momma 2 Sydney 9-8-09 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I think it should be stopped by like age 2 or 3 personally but 5 is wayyy to long!
2007-11-27 16:05:57 · answer #2 · answered by Courtney 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Breastfeeding any child should be stopped at age 2, in my opinnion. Some doctor's want you to stop around age 1.
2007-11-27 16:06:48 · answer #3 · answered by quatrapiller 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I once heard of a woman who was still breastfeeding at age 10...
less than 2 years is recommended. more than that and you start getting weird looks ;)
2007-11-27 16:07:26 · answer #4 · answered by Alex 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
5 would be a bit old for breast feeding if you ask me. I think the child should stop when it can eat solid food (1 or so)... But what do I know.....
2007-11-27 16:06:40 · answer #5 · answered by Slapshot27 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I think it should be stopped even by age two..of a child of any gender.
2007-11-27 16:05:43 · answer #6 · answered by Princess Purple 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Holy crap, a 5 year old!! You're pumping it and serving it to him in a glass, right? Anything past 2 years old with the kid still latched onto your boob is bizarre.
2007-11-27 16:06:50 · answer #7 · answered by wwhrd 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
YES age 5 is more than enough.
2007-11-27 16:05:27 · answer #8 · answered by kim t 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I do agree with you but I don't see a difference wether it's a little boy or little girl
2007-11-27 16:05:48 · answer #9 · answered by B2B2008 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think the breast feeding should have been stopped.
2007-11-27 16:06:20 · answer #10 · answered by Debbie 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋