English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I don't really want dancing at my wedding, but my fiance is very set on the idea. Our wedding will be held at a garden at around 4 PM- 7:30 PM. I'm worried that my guests will be uncomfortable dancing in public in total daylight. Do you think it would be ok to just use the 1st dance and wedding party dances? what are some other alternatives?

2007-11-27 07:46:34 · 25 answers · asked by ceco 1 in Family & Relationships Marriage & Divorce

25 answers

I think dancing would be almost expected. If you don't care to dance, tell your fiancee that you will not dance or only one dance, etc. If you have your dance floor small and the band doesn't play music that is traditional "dance" music, this will discourage dancing. If you do that, it will let your future husband that you are willing to compromise and work with him but you'll be doing it in a way where you are both happy with the outcome. Compromising is a great way to start off a successful marriage! Congrats!

2007-11-27 07:52:00 · answer #1 · answered by goddessusie 3 · 0 0

Dancing livens up any wedding. I had an outside May wedding and we danced the whole reception. It shouldnt matter if its bright outside or not, fun is fun. And honestly if you don't offer some sort of dancing then guest will start leaving early and the reception will die off before the times even up. But make sure you two get out there and dance.. its much easier for others to join in when they see the bride and groom having so much fun. Also a good DJ is a must.. one who keeps the music flowing and the guests interested.

Btw.. my husband and I do NOT dance. Infact our wedding was the first time for us and we had a blast. I am still getting complements on how much fun it was. You want the wedding to be enjoyable and memorable, not dull.

2007-11-27 08:11:39 · answer #2 · answered by Mrs. N™ 5 · 0 0

Well, you'll need to make sure there is some kind of dance floor surface outdoors to make this work. I don't know any people who are avid dancers that will be inhibited by daylight. It's not like you're going to be having pole dancers.

Start now learning how to give and take and let your fiance get his way on this. If you have some kind of gazebo, roof, streamer/tent kind of setting the dance area apart, it will seem more natural. Remember at the end of "My Best Friend's Wedding?" It was dark by then, but I'm talking about the way it was decorated.

2007-11-27 07:52:15 · answer #3 · answered by snapoutofit 4 · 0 0

I would say do the First Dance, Daddy/Daughter & Mother/Son dance, and maybe one other organised dance, but then just let music play and your guests do what they feel comfortable doing. If someone wants to dance and there is a place to, do it, why not. If nobody wants to dance, they don';t have to. As far as your fiance wanting dancing, I say think hard and compromise. Even if you don't want it, it's his wedding too, and it doesn't hurt to give in so that everyone can be happy! Good Luck!

2007-11-27 07:52:00 · answer #4 · answered by coopermom2006 3 · 1 0

Getting married and already having a disagreement?
Just joking...okay...please don't be offended...
First off if that's what she really wants, let it be after all this is hopefully a one time thing...
Secondly your guests shouldn't be uncomfortable dancing at any time if they can dance...
and they always have the option not to dance, you're not forcing anyone on the dance floor.
Your wedding day should be a total day of celebration and dancing has always been a way to celebrate at a function such as a wedding.
So be merry dance, dance, dance..............

2007-11-27 07:56:47 · answer #5 · answered by yahoo 3 · 0 0

The first dance and wedding party dances will be great for everyone to join in on, the slower dances, but then, let the ones that want to, loosen up and cut a rug.... let them do the electric slide, and any other dances they might want to do... It doesn't all have to be that formal of a dance...

2007-11-27 07:55:48 · answer #6 · answered by sunflowergal 4 · 0 0

Either have dancing or have NO dancing but don't try to have have just the dances for the bridal party, that would be exceedingly ungracious and rude. The whole concept of having dancing is so that all can celebrate and share with you. A small quartet playing waltzes is sufficient.

2007-11-27 07:55:28 · answer #7 · answered by Rebecca W 7 · 0 0

Yes it's ok, and no most people don't care where they are when it comes to dancing. Everyone knows that after the wedding comes the party...

2007-11-27 07:55:19 · answer #8 · answered by harold 4 · 0 0

At my wedding, we had first dance, and parent dances. While there was music, only a few people danced at the end of the wedding, it was very relaxing and laid back. If you have music, but no organized dancing (meaning the DJ shouting people onto the dance floor) (electric slide, cotton eyed joe, etc) people who want to dance will without it overpowering the rest of the party. This was the atmosphere at my wedding, and many people commented on how much they enjoyed it.

2016-05-26 03:30:15 · answer #9 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

It's okay because your husband wants it. It is called compromise. If people do not feel comfortable dancing in daylight then they won't. That will not stop you and your new hubby from dancing...at least I hope it won't. This will be the first of many compromises. That is one main thing in marriage. Trust me I have been married eight years and compromise is key.

2007-11-27 07:54:18 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers