Is $12 million really not enough to run a campaign? Or are candidates with $47 million just more appealing to voters?
2007-11-27 07:05:31 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Money is not tha important. But it can help. A bad candidate with alot of money can do better then they would normally
2007-11-27 07:13:59 · answer #1 · answered by TyranusXX 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The big deals Hillary is making to collect $10 million per month from greedy CEO's should make any of her supporters question her ethics.
2007-11-27 15:08:19 · answer #2 · answered by Steve C 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
They will take as much as they can get. Plastor TV with ads stickers,buttons, anything with there name on it. The more money the more exposer to voters.
2007-11-27 15:09:51 · answer #3 · answered by 2gadoo 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
47 million is not appealing to me. all that matters is who ever has the most money.
2007-11-27 15:10:32 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
hey buddy you need money to pay rent on that big white house and th servants and the gaurds those people arent cheap you no
2007-11-27 15:09:30 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Its all proof that you have to be rich to president. So much for land of the free.
2007-11-27 15:08:01 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋