He seems way too "tell them what they wanna hear" for me...
2007-11-27
05:22:01
·
28 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Elections
OH let me be clear I don't trust Hillary either....what are we gonna do?
2007-11-27
05:26:58 ·
update #1
wingshooter that might be why I feel like he has his own agenda....I just feel so sad with what we have to pick from...it seems like Kerry and Gore all over again....
2007-11-27
05:29:34 ·
update #2
yes this is me, I am a real person, and I can show anyone who wants to see plenty of other pictures to prove it....can someone half way decent looking not have an opinion?
2007-11-27
05:31:43 ·
update #3
Sandra, all those stories are so sad, why does anyone hurt babies?
2007-11-27
05:40:35 ·
update #4
-- He was born of a Muslim father and an atheist mother, who in his own words was "a lonely witness for secular humanism, a soldier for New Deal, Peace Corps, and position paper liberalism." She divorced when he was two years old and remarried another Muslim living in Indonesia, where the young man was educated in Catholic and Muslim schools in one of the most radical Islamic countries in the world. Though his father and stepfather were both Muslim, he tries to mitigate their religion by saying that by the time his mother married them, they had become atheists. After he was ten years old, he mostly was raised by his atheist grandparents.
The New York Daily News reports that he changed his life in his junior year of college at Columbia: he said he stopped doing drugs, ran three miles a day, and "He went to socialist conferences at Cooper Union and African cultural fairs in Brooklyn and started lecturing his relatives..." After graduating Columbia and then Harvard, he began working in Chicago supporting social programs. He recruited a local United Church of Christ Church on a government-sponsored community outreach. Around 1988, he joined the church because, he says, "that religious commitment did not require me to suspend critical thinking, disengage from the battle for social justice, or otherwise retreat from the world that I knew and loved."
The United Church of Christ is not to be confused with the "Church of Christ." The United Church of Christ, however, supports homosexual marriage, abortion, environmental justice, globalism, the International Criminal Court, the Palestinian movement and believes that Israel is illegally occupying the covenant land. The UCC seems to conveniently justify and legitimize his beliefs that social progressivism is equal to Christ and he writes in his memoirs that his own salvation was not an "epiphany." He reasoned after his daughter asked about life after death, "I wasn't sure what happens when we die, any more than I was sure where the soul resides or what existed before the Big Bang."
His name is Barak Hussein Obama. And he is running for President. He is courting evangelical Christians from the pulpit at Rick Warren's Saddleback church and by using public proclamations reported in the news media. Some Christians are saying he is a Democrat that evangelical Christians can support. Many have suggested that his Islamic and atheist upbringing combined with his social progressive membership in the United Church of Christ make him an outstanding presidential candidate. Others believe he may be a threat to the national security. Will the real Obama please stand up? Jesus said in Matthew 7:15, "Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves."
2007-11-27 05:25:35
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
4⤋
I wouldn't call Obama a fraud. What is so fruadulant? He has failed to come up with any real plan to fight the issues of our countries. Obama for me has little to no political experience. Now on the other hand, Clinton, also has little to no political experience. Sure she has been in the Senate now for like 8years but constantly votes in the middle. This way she offends no one for her run for the White House. She doesn't take a stand on anything. When anyone questions a decision she made she merely complains she was mislead by someone else, or spouts some generalizism idea and says they missed their target. "you don't want babies to go hungery do you?" --comes to mind,on an issue not even dealing with poverty or starving kids. It's called the misdirect. Listen to these politicians. They say they have a plan, but what actually is it? They won't say. They will only say, "it's better." During the last CNN debate it was determined that CNN and the college filled the room with Hillary supporters and people unwilling to ask ol Hillary the tough questions. This was more to make her look good and discredit Obama. (as the crowd boo'd when he spoke) How unprofessional. Hillary will fail to produce and state her plan, because no one will directly force her to be specific. And if she gets the democratic nomination she will all be sure to not say anything. See she won't have to. She is banking her campaign on the fact that people are so disinfranchised with the war that they will vote for anyone other than the Republicans. That is her game. Poor Obama, although, savvy like Clinton and soliciting the money, will have no chance unless he can make Iowa love him. The best candidates for the job are currently in the republican party, however, I am truely afraid that people are too blinded by the media to see it. There is just not enough well educated individuals out there speaking up so others can hear.
2007-11-27 06:23:14
·
answer #2
·
answered by amber s 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
confident, Obama is a huge fraud, for a loss of a greater physically powerful be conscious. in simple terms seem at what he's doing, and evaluate that to what Bush has performed. do no longer you notice that Obama is in simple terms Bush 2.0? the two way, the two Bush and Obama are in simple terms ceremonial casualties of the moguls in skill. human beings gets offended if such human beings die, however the moguls will in simple terms as definitely replace Obama with somebody drastically worse. In layman's term: The moguls will in simple terms assassinate Obama while the time is stable and spark an unquenchable, grade S disaster. in simple terms bear in mind, the moguls love elevating human beings up and then the two completely demonizing them or outright assassinating them. Obama is not any exception, as quickly as his reason has been stumbled on through the individuals, the moguls will in simple terms kill him by using fact he's of no extra use and spark international conflict.
2016-10-18 05:53:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by Erika 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Obama is nowhere near the fraud that all current Repug wanna-bees are. I'm afraid the 2008 election will boil down to voting for the lesser evil - in which case, Dennis Kuschinich is my man, and Obama for his V.P.
2007-11-27 05:40:23
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
You have defined the Hillary campaign.
Look up fraud in the dictionary and there's Hillary with her fake smile.
2007-11-27 05:25:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by Philip McCrevice 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
The Irony of the question rests in the Avatar of the asker. I am just so sure that that is a real picture. Fraud? I guess you would know.
2007-11-27 05:28:40
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
ttyyyaaahhh! put me down for yes, fraud of the first order.
in the words of john kerry "can i get me some more of those picture links of you?"
2007-11-27 10:35:29
·
answer #7
·
answered by ab dominance 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not nearly as much as Hillary Clinton....all politicians tell you what you want to hear...otherwise , they have very little chance of getting elected.
2007-11-27 05:25:01
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
in my opinion, i would never want a man that wont place his hand over his heart during the pledge of alligence to run my country!
sad to say but out of all hillary looks pretty good....
2007-11-27 05:26:07
·
answer #9
·
answered by luvmyboxer 3
·
3⤊
2⤋
All politicos are that way. Lie to get in, and then pursue you own aganda when you're elected.
2007-11-27 05:25:28
·
answer #10
·
answered by WC 7
·
2⤊
0⤋