2007-11-27 04:36:31 · 6 answers · asked by Nick 1 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
$23,543.32
2007-11-27 04:39:48 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Post Gazette doesn't give a number, but with some of the numbers they give at the bottom of the article, it couldn't have been cheap. Whatever they paid, it was too much. They might as well have poured the money down the drain cause it didn't do any good after getting 2" of rain yesterday.
2007-11-27 04:42:27 · answer #2 · answered by DGS 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
there's no way the could have replaced the field monday night after the game.
they would have done it the next day
2007-11-27 04:40:01 · answer #3 · answered by Jes Won 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
about as much as it looked like it cost them to put it down in the first place.......bout tree fiddy.
2007-11-27 04:46:33 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
thy come here to Columbus,Ohio and get some cow pasture
2007-11-27 04:41:15 · answer #5 · answered by lost 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
$23,543.32
2007-11-27 04:47:35 · answer #6 · answered by metoo 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋