Bush Bashing is our new number one pastime. It has set new records over the Clinton Crushing of yesteryear. We may have Clinton II in a year or so, we would like to call the "Rematch of the Century." check it out on pay per view for 49.95 next fall.
2007-11-27 03:32:13
·
answer #1
·
answered by libsticker 7
·
4⤊
2⤋
It is an interesting correlation. First thought was John Mc Enroe early days, upset and yelling at line judges. Claiming foul. Now American Express is running ads where he is sorry.
Politics breeds strange bedfellow. Competition is stiff. As in sport you fight to win. Some forget the game. Just adapt into the competition. And lose their edge. Like Mac did. YA is a game in itself. When some can not explain they complain. Some forget on line harassment is actually a federal offense. Person attacks have been growing. That's a bad sign. Yet once this 2008 campaign gets really underway? Expect bad behaviour every where. Posters are only following trends.
With sport , politics and religion comes passion.
Agree whole heartedly, partisanship only divides us. If one starts on the opposing team how can we work united for the good of all? Thanks for the excellent question.
2007-11-27 04:15:31
·
answer #2
·
answered by Mele Kai 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think there are relatively few people that actually think that way, although they are vocal. I don't know any strictly conservative or liberal people. Everyone I know is a mix of the two. For example, I don't know anyone who isn't conservative on crime. The red and blue crowd is either just having some fun or they're complete idiots and can be ignored. Any thinking person understands that neither party can claim the moral high ground, and there are few true differences between the two.
2007-11-27 03:33:26
·
answer #3
·
answered by thor_torkenson 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think that this is how people think about most things. If you don't agree with me, you're against me. It's a little warped. And these days it doesn't seem to matter who is in the chair, nothing is really done FOR the people, it's all for the politician. Just like in sports, it's not played for the fans but for the paycheck and the glory. So long as we have egomaniacs in power, dem or rep, this will continue.
2007-11-27 03:32:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
IMO it is going to no longer. The persuasion additionally has many double criteria which incorporate while South Africa copped carrying bans while different repressive regimes in Africa and the Communist block did no longer. once you think approximately secular democracy isn't maximum of the folk gadget interior the international those bans seem surprisingly dumb to me. even nevertheless via a similar token game should not be used via governments for nationalist propaganda the two. And shall we additionally ask in spite of if activities might desire to combination with the corporate international with all of this professionalism, endorsments, and so forth... in undemanding terms some concepts.
2016-12-30 05:24:20
·
answer #5
·
answered by treacy 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Politics IS a sport - a contact sport
Play hard!
Our politics are actually quite reserved compared to some nations. Their Congressmen (or equivalent) actually get into fistfights while in session. Hmm...I sure would love to see someone pop Harry Reid a good one : )
2007-11-27 04:17:42
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Much like sports, politics is a completely futile exercise that wouldn't even be worth watching were it not for the chance at wagering.
2007-11-27 03:45:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I agree. Nothing wrong with picking a side, but when it is about something more important than football, please pick for a reason. Don't be a Democrat because all your friends are Republican and you want to bust their balls. Don't pick a party because your parents or schoolteacher told you to. Figure out what they stand for, figure out what you stand for, and then pick.
2007-11-27 03:33:40
·
answer #8
·
answered by wayfaroutthere 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Q/A's are often posted to stir debate, granted the quality of the debates may be lacking, but this is still democracy.
I personally like this and other sites to echo my thoughts on.
2007-11-27 03:32:31
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Because just like sports we can cheer boo and cry about politics but we have no effect on the end result with the performers simply walking away with our money.
2007-11-27 03:31:23
·
answer #10
·
answered by The President 3
·
2⤊
2⤋