I know Ron Paul isn't a member....
:-)
The Council on Foreign Relations, or CFR, was founded in 1921 and has long been thought of as some mysterious organization whose positions and agendas are shrouded in secrecy. Their official policy states:
“…the Council on Foreign Relations is an independent, national membership organization and a nonpartisan center for scholars dedicated to producing and disseminating ideas so that individual and corporate members, as well as policymakers, journalists, students, and interested citizens in the United States and other countries, can better understand the world and the foreign policy choices facing the United States and other governments….”
But the truth of the matter is very much deeper then this. The CFR has openly disclosed what their true agenda actually is. Even though they have openly exposed their agenda to the public, most people still do not want to debate what this organization is up to. Perhaps it’s because people don’t want to know the true nature of the CFR or they don’t want to believe that their favorite politician is part of such an organization. Some even deny that the CFR is anything but benevolent, once they discover their favorite candidate is a member.
http://www.criticalreactor.com/2007/07/25/the-cfr-and-the-2008-presidential-candidates/
2007-11-27 03:20:29
·
answer #1
·
answered by ? 6
·
7⤊
2⤋
1. NO, Never!
2. Yes, the C.F.R. has many members and companies that benefit greatly from international business. The more political control they gain in the world, the more powerful & wealthy they become. If the North American Union is formed it will cause the U.S. Constitution, and all it's wisdom, including "The Bill of Rights", to be superceded by as yet unspecified laws, designed to further erode "We the Peoples" freedoms.
Please compare it to the expansion of the old USSR, which was a system that eventually collapsed because of too much dependence on a centralized Government!
Elect Ron Paul to shrink our already massive American Government.
Thank you for the question.
*********************************************************
2007-11-27 12:59:14
·
answer #2
·
answered by beesting 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
All candidates are of the CFR, Ti-laterals or Bilderbergs. Except Paul. But you remember what happened to JFK when he let it slip he wanted to do away with the Fed Reserve, Don't you??
2007-11-27 11:48:53
·
answer #3
·
answered by Cookies Anyone? 5
·
5⤊
1⤋
Aren't they rather similar to the original Dutch company that began colonizing South Africa and ruled with a biblical iron fist? That area has never really recovered. Soo not likely they'd get a vote from me.
2007-11-27 13:13:59
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
I vote for people who have done the most they could for America in the past and not just the state they were working in. This narrows down the playing field quite a bit and makes those people stand out.
2007-11-27 11:22:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Yes I do know about the CFR, and yes I would vote for someone who is a member. It is a very powerful organization that contains influential people. Why wouldn't you vote for someone who is in this?
Edit: A NAU wouldn't be the horrid thing the liberal left is making it out to be. It would promote free trade, which is the basis for our society. It would also allow us to compete with China, India, the EU, etc. better then we are now. The average American citizen would not see any change by the NAU.
2007-11-27 11:17:14
·
answer #6
·
answered by mustagme 7
·
0⤊
7⤋
The only one that is running that is not a member or soon to be a member that I know of is Ron Paul.
I dont like it any more that you do but what are our alternatives?
2007-11-27 18:05:34
·
answer #7
·
answered by Grogan 5
·
3⤊
1⤋
NO - I would not vote for them and that is why I think Thompson is lying through his teeth. Yes, I have known who they are - have you seen all their members?
2007-11-27 12:27:03
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
I cannot and will not support NAU or anything like it..
2007-11-27 11:54:23
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
Nothing wrong with the CFR.
It's the Trilateral Commission you've got to look out for.
2007-11-27 11:30:53
·
answer #10
·
answered by RTO Trainer 6
·
2⤊
7⤋