".... nuclear energy may just be the energy source that can save our planet from another possible disaster: catastrophic climate change."
Are the Dems trying to destroy America and our planet by NOT allowing the US to build nuclear plants?
http://blogs.chron.com/sciguy/archives/2006/04/greenpeace_foun.html
2007-11-27 02:58:10 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Okay, we can build one in your back yard first!! But, if global warming doesn't get us, the incredibly large asteroid may, or the cooling of the earth...the magnetic pole reversing will cause a lot of problems too...including letting in lots of radiation that it normally keeps out. Oh, just pick one if you don't like global warming! The planet has survived many of them before...it may not survive a few of the other alternatives!
2007-11-27 03:05:15 · answer #1 · answered by fairly smart 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
That article is written by the Greenpeace founder (obviously a Dem) and supports nuclear power.
2007-11-27 03:02:06 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Nuclear energy seems to be the most responsible approach to our future energy needs. We should be building new nuclear plants.
2007-11-27 03:05:34 · answer #3 · answered by Zardoz 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
So let me get this streight just so we are all on the same page; Bush recomends building new Nuke plants and the left balks at him and says it is stupid blah blah blah same ol' same ol', the guy from Greenpeace does it and all of a sudden it is a great idea?
Shows how partisan the Demos are
2007-11-27 03:18:50 · answer #4 · answered by Tip 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Nuclear skill vegetation are costly to construct on earth. that they had be prohibitively costly to construct on the moon. we could have the skill to flow the ability back employing microwaves, in spite of the shown fact that it would in simple terms cost too lots. There might additionally be the priority of having the nuclear gas rods there. could you think of the an infection if the automobile wearing them exploded on the way up? I do think of we could build some type of photograph voltaic stations in orbit around the sunlight to beam back to the earth as microwaves. that they had have the skill to convey at the same time extremely a lot of photograph voltaic skill 24/7 and be thoroughly sparkling and risk-free.
2016-10-18 05:39:22 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's more about the planet being able to sustain life as we know it that is the real quest....
2007-11-27 03:07:13 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's OK with me if it's done right with enviromental safeguards, which shouldn't be that hard in this day and age.
2007-11-27 03:06:30 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
false problem yields false solution, imo
2007-11-27 03:01:50 · answer #8 · answered by Spock (rhp) 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋