No
2007-11-27 03:00:07
·
answer #1
·
answered by booman17 7
·
4⤊
1⤋
for 2 key motives. First, regardless of each host's large listener base, both Limbaugh and O'Reilly are far too polarizing of figures to even remotely attraction to means voters from the different area of the aisle. Admittedly, i could imagine O'Reilly could have the better shot because of his extra centrist stance; even if, as I stated both are truly polarizing. 2d, neither has the favor to run or change into President of united statesa.. both firmly trust they wield extra means from behind the microphone then they could ever desire to from behind the table contained in the oval workplace. I recommend, check out what O'Reilly has been waiting to finish concerning newborn abduction/molestation guidelines in states all in the course of the country by making it the middle factor of his teach.
2016-10-25 03:13:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I like Bill O'Reilly... I don't like Rush Limbaugh... I don't think Bill O'Reilly would be a good president, though.
2007-11-27 03:02:08
·
answer #3
·
answered by R. Guetive 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
On a morning of nothing but mudslinging, insults and hate filled questions, that idea is by far the most insulting I have heard. Oh yeah, and the liberals would love to have a president that thinks they are all stupid. The only thing that would be great about that combination would be to enter them in a bullshit contest. They would have NO competition.
2007-11-27 03:02:24
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋
No while I do listen to and usually agree on some level with most of what they say I also change the station when they begin to bore me.
Once elected I would be stuck with them for 4 years with out the benefit of a remote to remove them.
2007-11-27 03:13:27
·
answer #5
·
answered by CFB 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
Yes Rush can get my vote. Bil O i wouldnt vote for
2007-11-27 04:57:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Loud mouth idiots, I think were had enough of them. We deserve a lot better candidates than we've gotten, there isn't a single one I'd even think about voting for. How about someone interested in doing something for the people with all the hard earned money we give them. Spending our tax money to give more and more money for their friends and themselves is their only priority. What a bunch of crooks,and the slimy media that promotes them are even a lower life form, what are you thinking!
2007-11-27 03:11:22
·
answer #7
·
answered by Ktcyan 5
·
1⤊
3⤋
They wouldn't vote for themselves, so I wouldn't vote that ticket, either. Their role in American media is social commentary and entertainment. Rush, particularly, is an entertainer. Both are masterful analysts of current events. While they play an important watchdog role in the political scene I don't think their social and political insights would ever qualify them to lead America. I think they would be the first to agree.
2007-11-27 03:10:30
·
answer #8
·
answered by Ian 2
·
1⤊
3⤋
Yes I'd vote for them.
I don't think I could vote for a Muslim to run America. Or a Clinton again. So what else is left?
2007-11-27 03:06:25
·
answer #9
·
answered by doodlesfl 3
·
2⤊
3⤋
Why would liberals have to admit the "truth" of such an idiotic proposition?
2007-11-27 03:24:45
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
Remember Gary Coleman?
By a MILE!
2007-11-27 03:10:18
·
answer #11
·
answered by tony key / tony romero 3
·
0⤊
3⤋