English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-11-27 02:44:24 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science Other - Social Science

13 answers

Congratulations - you're the 303rd one to ask this so far. Type it in to "Search for questions" and you can see all the answers to them as well ! ! !

2007-11-27 03:27:20 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

the long-standing debate over which came first - the chicken or the egg - and opted for the egg.

Professor John Brookfield, a genetics expert from Nottingham University, said the first chicken must have started out as an embryo in an egg.

This means the organism in the eggshell would have the same DNA as the chicken.

He explained that the reason was due to the fact that genetic material does not change during an animal's life.

Professor Brookfield said: "The first living thing which we could say unequivocally was a member of the species would be this first egg, so I would conclude that the egg came first."

2007-11-27 03:03:11 · answer #2 · answered by fozz 4 · 1 0

In nature, living things evolve through changes in their DNA. In an animal like a chicken, DNA from a male sperm cell and a female ovum meet and combine to form a zygote -- the first cell of a new baby chicken. This first cell divides innumerable times to form all of the cells of the complete animal. In any animal, every cell contains exactly the same DNA, and that DNA comes from the zygote.

Chickens evolved from non-chickens through small changes caused by the mixing of male and female DNA or by mutations to the DNA that produced the zygote. These changes and mutations only have an effect at the point where a new zygote is created. That is, two non-chickens mated and the DNA in their new zygote contained the mutation(s) that produced the first true chicken. That one zygote cell divided to produce the first true chicken.

Prior to that first true chicken zygote, there were only non-chickens. The zygote cell is the only place where DNA mutations could produce a new animal, and the zygote cell is housed in the chicken's egg. So, the egg must have come first, and when it hatched, there was the chicken...

2007-12-01 02:19:26 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

In nature, living things evolve through changes in their DNA. In an animal like a chicken, DNA from a male sperm cell and a female ovum meet and combine to form a zygote -- the first cell of a new baby chicken. This first cell divides innumerable times to form all of the cells of the complete animal. In any animal, every cell contains exactly the same DNA, and that DNA comes from the zygote.

Chickens evolved from non-chickens through small changes caused by the mixing of male and female DNA or by mutations to the DNA that produced the zygote. These changes and mutations only have an effect at the point where a new zygote is created. That is, two non-chickens mated and the DNA in their new zygote contained the mutation(s) that produced the first true chicken. That one zygote cell divided to produce the first true chicken.

Prior to that first true chicken zygote, there were only non-chickens. The zygote cell is the only place where DNA mutations could produce a new animal, and the zygote cell is housed in the chicken's egg. So, the egg must have come first.

2007-11-27 16:50:41 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

The egg and the chicken are lieing in bed. The chicken rolls over and lights a cigarette. The egg mumbles under its breath "well that answers that riddle"

Hope that answers that once and for all

2007-11-27 02:50:09 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

this one is 2 easy, the chicken had to come first as the egg could not possibly hatch unless there was a chicken on top keeping it at the right temperature at all times!! also i think they wernt always eggs but the chicklets evolved over millions of years as they were to weak without a shell!!
give me best answer fool!!

also what will always win? rock, scissors or paper?

2007-11-27 18:05:15 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

The DNA without it you don't have the chicken or the egg. I meant Chicken Dna of course.

2007-11-27 02:50:18 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

well the egg was laid by an ancestor of the chicken who was in a state of evolution and out of the egg came the chick.

2007-11-27 02:49:07 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The chicken.

2007-11-27 02:51:40 · answer #9 · answered by Kelsette 3 · 0 0

the chicken... no the egg...no the chicken! ah, i don't know!x

2007-11-27 02:49:49 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers