English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Happy Tuesday! :)

And that's completely original in the sense that you don't feel that they were (heavily) influenced by any act that came before them...that their sound was the first of its kind.

Just curious...

2007-11-27 02:11:10 · 35 answers · asked by Sookie 6 in Entertainment & Music Music Rock and Pop

Thanks, rckets! :)

2007-11-27 02:24:49 · update #1

Beatle fanatic - thanks...have a good one!

2007-11-27 02:33:05 · update #2

Hey, Prof!

2007-11-27 03:01:48 · update #3

huevo - thank you!

2007-11-27 03:02:08 · update #4

Good morning, Given! :)

2007-11-27 03:23:23 · update #5

Thanks, Smiley. This asker doesn't hand out thumbs-down either - our opinions are completely subjective and our tastes are our own, so I agree that everyone is welcome to theirs.

2007-11-27 05:52:30 · update #6

Hope it's a great evening over there, Silver! :)

2007-11-27 05:53:57 · update #7

Thank you, Bryan Rock!

2007-11-27 05:55:18 · update #8

Darth - thanks!

2007-11-27 05:55:59 · update #9

BC - no apology is necessary. :)

2007-11-27 05:56:22 · update #10

35 answers

Happy Tuesday!!

It's an interesting question. I was looking through my iTunes library to try to get some answers and it's funny how few bands (including really almost all of my favorites) aren't really breaking truly significant new ground. As much as I feel groups like Stephen Malkmus, Belle and Sebastian, Wilco, Okkervil River, Apollo Sunshine, etc. are doing interesting things that are new, you can in many cases still speculate their influences. A couple things that are more recent that I can think of would be:
Hella
the Arm of Roger (Grandaddy side project record that was incredibly silly)
JC and the Illegitimate Kids (a buddy of mine who does funny songs, minus Tropical Fish which I was kind of suprised to find on that page. Check out Shine box. If you like that, they're all pretty good.) http://www.myspace.com/joncaligiuri

...and some older stuff that comes to mind:
the Talking Heads
Tom Waits
Sonic Youth

********************
Great call on Stereolab Huevo. I saw them in my library and actually meant to type them too. They do have a very original sound.

****************
Oh, and for older stuff that is unsung (I figured I would leave out things like the Beatles and Velvet Underground) I would say Can.

2007-11-27 02:47:30 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 12 0

And a fantastic Tuesday to you as well.

I sure there's more recent ones but the most original musical artist I can come up with is Stereolab. I can't think of anyone who shared their their style beforehand or even afterwards. So different from anything out there.

I'd also say Beck kind of fits into that category as well. He has some earlier influences but there are times (such as the Odelay album) where he seems to grab a concept from mid-air and just runs with it.

Edit: I'll agree with you Smiley, the only way you might be able to come up with something entirely original is to leave a baby in a room with a set of instruments and no outside influence, then come back and get him/her in about 25 years. Everything does come from another influence, it's just that some things are a lot more original than others.

2007-11-27 02:51:46 · answer #2 · answered by Huevo 6 · 9 1

You can hear obviously funk and heavy metal (and funk metal), as well as rap and hip hop influences to them, but in my opinion, Rage Against the Machine was fairly unique. It was mainly due to Tom Morello though, the guitarist. If you haven't listened to them, try them out. You probably wouldn't like rap vocals, but if you listen to the guitar, it's unlike anything I ever have heard and probably ever will hear. Try "Killing In The Name", which has one of Morello's best trademark high-pitched solos, or "Bulls On Parade", which imitates a turntable sound, or maybe "Guerilla Radio", which has a "harmonica guitar" solo. And for riffs, there's "Calm Like A Bomb" and "Ashes In The Fall". I won't say they're the most unique band, but they're fairly original for a band in the 90's. Then again, I haven't listened to much indie rock, which seems to be original. I probably won't get best answer, but if you haven't listened to their music, give them a try first!

Another one I can think of is R.E.M., from the early 80's. The production is fairly interesting. Their vocals are sometimes faded and hard to understand. The bass is a bit more audible, and it is a melodic bass, which I rarely hear. Peter Buck, the guitarist, has some chiming, jangly riffs that I don't think I heard much of during the 70's or 80's.

2007-11-27 11:45:03 · answer #3 · answered by Montag 5 · 7 0

Happy Tuesday evening :)
{17:22 here}

I honestly can't think of one, with the possible exception of
Mike Oldfield. But since he started 25-years ago, that shows how little originality there is now.

And I suppose {limited musical knowledge showing here!} that no one other than Blackmore's Night have combined Renaissance / Folk / Rock. At least, not in the way they do.





np: 'Wolf To the Moon' ~ Richie Blackmore's Rainbow

2007-11-27 04:25:57 · answer #4 · answered by Lady Silver Rose * Wolf 7 · 4 0

Tool
Mindless Self Indulgence

Smiley - I disagree, even with your 13 paragraph explanation. I feel like bands that combine several genres of music together to create a new and different sound is exactly what makes them original. Now if modern bands STILL produced the same sound as Sabbath and Deep Purple then that would be a lack of originality.. but mixing it up and combining genres shows originality.

Well there's one thing we agree on, I don't hand out a thumbs down either when someone expresses their opinion. You got those elsewhere. You say you respect everyones opinion but it seems like you're not respecting mine, in fact you got really bent out of shape over it. I think we should agree to disagree on this because I for one am not going back and forth about it all day. I gave my opinion and I'm done.

Sorry to fill your question with all this Sookie!

2007-11-27 02:18:55 · answer #5 · answered by MC BC 6 · 10 1

Good morning=)

I would have to go with the following bands:

Sigur Ros - I don't think anyone sounds like them... plus Jonsi sings () in an invented language called Hopelandic. I don't understand it with my ears, but I do with my spirit. I don't think there are any bands out there like Sigur Ros.

They Might Be Giants - Nerd rock and pop at it's finest. I think these guys are just too geeky to emulate. They write awesome songs though and you feel a little more educated after hearing one of their albums.

Aphex Twin - Richard James aka Aphex Twin pushed Acid and D&B electronica almost to the point of overload. Aphex would be the techno equivelent to Ministry in the rock world.

The Beastie Boys - Not even white rappers have ever been able to emulate their sound.

2007-11-27 03:21:37 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 7 0

Robert Randolph Family
Alicia Keys

2007-11-27 02:52:37 · answer #7 · answered by James M 6 · 3 0

Family Force 5

2007-11-27 02:16:57 · answer #8 · answered by Raisins Badeaux 6 · 4 1

I can't seem to be able to find a good example. When I think of the history of Music, it's more of an Evolution. Every artist has elements of a previous artist that are glaringly obvious to me. A couple I might be able to give the nod to would be The Meteors, Gogol Bordello, Pogues, and RHCP.
Oh, and Richard Cheese. Definitely out on his own there (for the most part anyway).

2007-11-27 02:26:50 · answer #9 · answered by Master C 6 · 8 0

Aphex Twin has done some stuff (not all, of course) in the field of electronic music which has no forebear. As original, at times, in the 2000s as Kraftwerk were in the 1970s.

Ministry, Revco, Robert Fripp, Brian Eno...a couple more brave souls who created sounds and textures knowing that they might have no commercial appeal - which is the normal downside of originality.

2007-11-27 03:12:04 · answer #10 · answered by Bowzer 7 · 10 0

fedest.com, questions and answers