English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-11-27 02:05:49 · 10 answers · asked by Earl Grey 5 in Politics & Government Politics

10 answers

They're certainly not talking about it as much as they should, but all the Democratic candidates have plans to deal with global warming.

http://www.grist.org/feature/2007/07/06/candidates/

And even the Republicans have all come out saying that we need to deal with the issue (except Thompson who's sitting on the fence, and Paul who hardly counts).

To be honest I don't know why they're not discussing it more. Probably because the Democrats all essentially agree on the issue, so perhaps they're saving it for the general election where they can show a policy difference with their Republican opponent.

2007-11-27 03:49:25 · answer #1 · answered by Dana1981 7 · 1 0

Whats the use of talking about global warming ?

People would then expect the government to be able to do something about it.

And the government can do nothing about global warming.

Think about it, the largest contributor of green house gas's, is fossil fuel power plants.

The only viable replacement for fossil fuel power plants, are nuclear power plants.

Except the people who think global warming is the biggest problem, are against nuclear power.

Doesn't make sense does it.

They bring up a problem, find the cause, then are against the only fix, for that cause.

2007-11-27 10:49:57 · answer #2 · answered by jeeper_peeper321 7 · 0 1

Actually they are. Mostly Democrats and they talk environment mostly but its all the same thing. Republicans will acknowledge global warming however won't make it a big issues because most people planning to vote Republican don't consider the environment a big enough issue.

2007-11-27 10:14:51 · answer #3 · answered by Jerbson 5 · 1 0

The same reason they aren't talking about aliens....oops, except Kucinich. Since there is no proof of man made global warming, and the evidence is pointing strongly to the side that it is a natural cycle, they are leaving that to alarmists and their leader, Al Gore.

2007-11-27 10:10:25 · answer #4 · answered by booman17 7 · 0 2

Maybe because global warming is a load of crap! Natural climate changes are not the stuff of presidential debates!

2007-11-27 10:13:34 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Only the ones that dont offer real solutions are leading in the polls. And I dont understand that

2007-11-27 10:23:30 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Too sensitive an issue

2007-11-27 10:14:00 · answer #7 · answered by Jaco W 3 · 0 1

Because its a hoax

2007-11-27 10:14:06 · answer #8 · answered by Ancient Warrior DogueDe Bordeaux 5 · 1 2

Why are they not talking about illegal immigration?

2007-11-27 10:10:01 · answer #9 · answered by grumpyoldman 7 · 1 1

because it doesn't exist.

2007-11-27 10:38:03 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers