Y E S, you got that right. Research is lots better than making unfounded judgments!!
2007-11-27 05:12:48
·
answer #1
·
answered by Vagabond5879 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Even G.W.Junior has begun to accept that global warming may be a reality although he is unprepared to actually do anything about it. Few presidents would be when the effects of global warming are going to take a while to be felt and last a long time, but there is always another election in four years time.
As for Junior being the worst..come on, of course he is, so far.We have been on a downward spiral with American presidents for over forty years..give or take...Nixon who did nothing wrong but was given a pardon for it anyway, Ford, who no one voted for and no one would ever admit they might have voted for if there had been a choice; the peanut farmer; the Hollywood has-been, Bush senior who, to be fair, was a frighteningly competent leader..and who, if anything went wrong, had never been there in the first place and couple prove it with photographs of himself not being there..and others of himself playing gold. And then the guy who declared that oral sex was not adultery ( which would be true only if he thought that oral sex meant talking about it) and who never touched Monica..well, only a little..with a cigar..yewich! Then along comes Junior to win the most fuddled election ever and ...well, we all know the rest. Aren't you just itching to know what the next one will do?
2007-11-27 13:13:36
·
answer #2
·
answered by selina.evans 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
I know many people forget but Regan was not a beloved president by the entire country. In fact he had very low polling (not this low) but many people thought he would bring about world war 3 or the end of the world, but now they feel differently. I don't want to compare Bush to Regan but I think there are to many questions about his presidency right now that really won't be able to be answered for many years to come. He may come out looking much better, or he could be proven have put us on the wrong path, only history will tell.
2007-11-27 08:38:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by G-gal 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
For both cases we have sufficient evidence.
But Bush would think that global warming doesnt matter as in the end "God will save us from it"so it also shows what a great president we have too.
Bush is not like the president who cant do his job properly,he is evil and he knows it.Tackling globalwarming would hurt his oil buddies industries as they probably dont follow some of the regulations on CO2 release.
So Both are ABSOLUTELY TRUE
2007-11-27 09:02:35
·
answer #4
·
answered by Bassman 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
More so no president is ever been judge the worst while in office.
Any historian worth their salt knows that you wait until the president is out of office and normally wait until they have been dead for a few years before that kind of judgement even starts.
2007-11-27 08:53:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
US satellite figures shows temperatures having fallen since 1998, declining in 2007 to a 1983 level - not to mention the newly revised figures for US surface temperatures showing that the 1930s had four of the 10 warmest years of the past century, with the hottest year of all being not 1998, as was previously claimed, but 1934. So GW is as big a lie as saying GWB is a bad president.
2007-11-27 08:29:56
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
4⤋
Its really hard to judge a president until some years after his presidency is over. I'm not sure what history will say about Bush, only time will tell.
2007-11-27 08:33:01
·
answer #7
·
answered by cmdrbnd007 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
There is sufficient evidence to evaluate both issues. Theoretically one could research any issue forever before reaching any conclusions. There are, no doubt, some people who would claim that further research is needed before we can definitively conclude that the earth revolves around the sun.
2007-11-27 08:46:12
·
answer #8
·
answered by tribeca_belle 7
·
3⤊
2⤋
Well actually when the decieved American Citizens elect someone who will continue Bushes follies and probably extend our follies even more. Those talking about military action with Iran seem determined to take the mantle from W and the soonest dat of time.
2007-11-27 08:31:22
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
More research will not help, look at the number of people who will not admit that clinton was the worst president this country has ever had.
2007-11-27 08:40:17
·
answer #10
·
answered by Scrappy52 6
·
1⤊
3⤋