It'd be interesting to see what a women can do in the white house. Plus, most people would agree her husband Bill was a good president......and that's because she influenced most of his decisions. Not to mention you will live to possibly see the first female president ever inducted into the white house. And also, it would kick down many more barriers for us women, thus making things easier ;-) and possibly provide more opportunities for women.
2007-11-26 20:08:41
·
answer #1
·
answered by Š 3
·
4⤊
5⤋
1. She has no experience - her decisions while Bill was in office were bombs, even got the White House it's first $1,000,000 fine for secret meetings
2. America will go to a more socialist state - WE will provide for you
Even though we can;t meet budget she is proposing:
a.$1,000 for every adult for their 401K
b. $5,000 for EVERY newborn in the US
3. Prolly push immigration through - so that in a few more years - when we are 51% MUSLIM - you and I will both be on the same page as it
will only take 5 years to revote out Congress, the Senate, and the President
and whether we are Dems or Repubs won't mean a thing
because we will have been outvoted - and America will be gone as we knew it
*********************************************
1) "We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good."
(2) "It's time for a new beginning, for an end to government of the few, by the few, and for the few...... and to replace it with shared responsibility for shared prosperity."
(3) "(We) ....can't just let business as usual go on, and that means something has to be taken away from some people."
(4) "We have to build a political consensus and that requires people to give up a little bit of their own turf in order to create this common ground."
(5) "I certainly think the free-market has failed."
(6) "I think it's time to send a clear message to what has become the most profitable sector in (the) entire economy that they are being watched."
Now you might think these were the famous words of the Father of communism, Karl Marx........
But no - It's Hillary
Comments made on:
(1) 6/29/04
(2) 5/29/07
(3) 6/4/07
(4) 6/4/07
(5) 6/4/07
(6) 9/2/05
Pretty scary.... isn't it.....and the comments are, too.
2007-11-27 04:19:25
·
answer #2
·
answered by tom4bucs 7
·
5⤊
1⤋
I am sorry to say, but I am going to try to convince you NOT to vote for her. Do you realize we have had twenty straight years of Bush/Clinton adminstrations? Do you want things to change or more of the same? The biggest problem I see in Hillary is that her presidency will perpetuate the endless partisan bickering. It's something no matter her best efforts, that she will not be able to be overcome. She will polarize the country, and we will again not be able to move forward as a country.
2007-11-27 04:34:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by lffty2001 2
·
4⤊
1⤋
Nothing. She had a hand in sacrificing the poor to no health care. She pushed HMO's in California.
HMO's are a sneaky way to deny health care to the poor. HMO's doors are locked for the poor. They only take people that can pay.
She also saw to it that HMO's cannot be sued for their malpractice by using the guise of ERISA protection.
HMO's also under her helping hands have decided that any damage to older patients are not compensable because retired people are deemed to be legally worthless. They can not suffer loss of income because they are retired.!!
The HMO's skim the 'cream' of paying patients off the top, which is driving community hospitals to bankruptcy.
These are the legacies of Hillary Clinton for the country's 'health' care.
Then she sneakily cries that the health care system is not working. And cheats the Doctors out of 90% of their fees for treating the 'government' patients.
If Hillary was put in charge of the Sahara desert, in 5 years there would be no sand!!!
2007-11-27 05:06:33
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
She only had $1000, but was able to purchase $12,000 worth of stock.
In 10 months she cashed out over $100,000!
She had never invested before.
So if she could make $99,000 in 10 months with no experience, imagine what she'll do as president, with only experience in cookie baking!
She removed and lost subpoenaed documents of billing records from the Rose Law Firm, relating to the failed savings and loan at the center of the White Water scam.
Two years later the documents owned by this firm, were found by Hillary's maid in Hill's closet at the White House.
As senator, she's done little. She's never honored a single 9/11 1st responder, nor a single fallen soldier, in the war against terror by attending a single funeral.
These are the highlights of her career. You decide.
2007-11-27 05:34:38
·
answer #5
·
answered by Mr. Me 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
...........?
None.
Except that close association to Bill. And that administration did not go well. A lowering of public expectations from the office of President. A lack of moral, ethical, and legal integrity. And now we see returned campaign contributions, and loaded audience questions designed to make her look good. How do these things qualify her to be president? She has no successes as senator that could be considered aspirations of Presidency. Dan Quayle had more qualifications than her, and he didn't come close.
No. I believe competition breeds quality. She is not the best the Democrats have.
2007-11-27 04:30:41
·
answer #6
·
answered by Robert S 6
·
3⤊
1⤋
She is natural born American, she is white, she is the pioneer seeking equality for women in America, whereas women in Europe, Asia, Latin America have long since were being elected; she is well known internationally and conducted herself very well with dignity and poise, she is intelligent and wise. She is liked by most internationally for the very dignified manner in which she conducted herself during the period her husband was being taken to task for the Monica affair whereby her family's unity and integrity is preserved. No one ever has come up with any act of extra - marital sex affairs during her entire life, which is very much the order of the day in the western world and America
She has done her home work well and her proposals are well balanced and the vast sections who stand to benefit shall bring about the inevitable - her land slide victory silently.
2007-11-27 06:48:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
She is a women, she is been in the white thus better for her in working in a familiar enviroment, it will take 8 year for some one like bush to know his way around the white house and still miss some.Furthermore, noboby is more fit to be a president right now then her unless Bush 's friend steal it again.
Macain a desserter,who never face combat other then let his plane be hit by the vietcong,giuliani, a traitor by conspiring 911 and ties to the mob,I mean nobody is fit to be president other then this lad. And more, while she was in the white house, nobody was being killed, gasoline was less then 2.50 a gallon, housing was cheaper,more then 3900 US soldiers were not death, about more then 100,000 Iraqis killed by the US armies becouse an inept oil greedy president who didnt want oil coming throught he back door oil for food program.These are the things which were not happening while she was at the white house.
2007-11-27 04:41:32
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
DO NOT VOTE FOR HILARY CLINTON!!!
I could care less if she's a woman or a man, or a lib or a con.
Don't vote for her because she's a SOCIALIST.
Our country stands for freedom
She stands for RESTRICTIONS on freedom
She wants to DISARM the populace.
She wants to restrict the media.
CHINA and NORTH KOREA dont allow their people to have guns and dictate what the media can show.
Vote for Obama or Edwards or McCain or Romney or Guilliani
Anybody is better than Hillary Clinton.
2007-11-27 04:13:49
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
3⤋
Hillary getting the Dem Nom is a guaranteeing a Republican Victory!Shes a walking contradiction...
2007-11-27 06:37:17
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
I can't think of any.
She has no experience.
she has not been an effective senator.
She does not take a firm stand on the issues.
She will destroy our free enterprise system
she thinks that the government is the answer when it is clearly not. Government should only do those things we cannot do ourselves.
She has limited leadership ability and what little she has leads in a direction I don't want to go.
With all of the dead people behind she and bill on their trail to power I would be awfully cautious in getting too close. Its not healthy
2007-11-27 04:14:10
·
answer #11
·
answered by rofe 5
·
5⤊
2⤋