George Dubbaya is not solely to blame. It's mainly the voters of the past 3 decades that never even sniffed at the possibility of America being attacked. And after the fact of being scared by 9/11 and the Bush administration (nothing to fear but fear and bush themselves?) statements of what "would" happen if he were not voted in again. I solely blame the American public for being so misinformed and unintelligent for the sad, sorry , state of things.
Many may not like it but the blunt fact truth of the matter: The U.S. Government is a product of the U.S. public's intelligence overall on BOTH sides of the political spectrum. I look around at our current government and I see a lot of lofty , dreamy , ungrounded, people. All with lofty ideals that they would love to stick to the American people and the world. But none have an answer for real world problems.
2007-11-26 19:46:51
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
4⤋
yes .it's bigger than one person as front man .
and consider Socrates the inventor of democracy who didn't even believe in it . demos meaning mob democracy mob rule now softened to mass or majority rule is a false facade for a semi representative gov. that is really a republic run by the aristocracy ,. this is why Bush is honest when he says he doesn't even pay attention to the poles . e.g. imagine five men in a boat four of them cannibals guess what the fifth man is on the menu . hence democracy would fail miserably but the aristocracy or extremely wealthy don't always have the answer either . I would think a benevolent dictatorship with public referendum poling might be best .
2007-11-26 19:43:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by dogpatch USA 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
we live in a society where nobody is responsible for their actions. if a guy goes home and beats the sh*t out of his wife and kids, its not his fault, hes an alcoholic and he cant help it. its the alcohols fault so we need ta take it away so it will never happen again. or someone doesnt have what they want or are not where they want to be in life, so its the gov't, or the schools, or society.
you want something in this life you better go out there and get it. noone is going to give you nothing.
2007-11-26 19:49:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
we all are at fault but i do not think things are that bad except for the war i have a warm house food good neighbors a little extra money damn little my bad state of things I'm getting older and falling apart just the fact bush got there i tip my hat
2007-11-26 22:39:21
·
answer #4
·
answered by Lance M 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
I guess I am, because I do. Well, maybe not everything, but I am disappointed about the wars and the oil prices. I figure that since we elected an oil millionaire as president that we cannot expect a discount. His co-hort isn't any more honest either.
2007-11-26 19:52:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by duaneb_59 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
It is the whole repub way of running the government. GW is part of the problem, but the bigger problem is that free market economics does not work. In addition to the failure of any foolish trickle down economics plan, failure to enforce laws against corrupt business practices always leads to boom and bust economics due to corruption.
In addition, the repub/neocon approach to international affairs is to support our corporations without consideration of what is right or wrong, and this is simply a foolish way to act.
Of course repubs would rather ignore reality, and of course blame everything on what ever demo they can blame. It is ridiculous for repubs to blame Clinton for GW's failure to protect our country. The repubs do nothing but play spoil sport politics that makes every thing worse.
2007-11-26 19:53:47
·
answer #6
·
answered by poet1b 4
·
1⤊
3⤋
I think the question should be....
Are people really stupid enough to NOT blame George Bush, Jr. himself for the bad state of things?
or
Are we stupid enough to elect him again?
Killing people is not a solution my friend.
2007-11-26 19:39:35
·
answer #7
·
answered by Hummingnerd 1
·
2⤊
6⤋
I blame Clinton for them mess we are in today...! Bush inhered the crap!
Clinton sucked!!
he could have killed Osama but didn't in the 90's!!
then 9/11 as a consequence!
He rode a wave of good times started in the previous administration, and took credit for it, meanwhile in HIS administration the dark clouds of Muslim extremism were gathering and he did crap about it:
(the WTC bombings in 1993)
http://cns.miis.edu/pubs/reports/wtc93.h...
(Somalia)
http://www.dhoogle.com/shopping-product-...
(the barracks bombings in Saudi Arabia)
http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/10/10/f...
(the embassies bombings in Africa)
http://images.search.yahoo.com/search/im...
the USS Cole........
http://images.search.yahoo.com/search/im...
Iraq wiggling out of santions from 1991 Gulf War and back in business as bad guy again...shooting at our pilots in the "No Fly Zones"!!!!!!!!!!!!!...acts of WAR in themselves, reason enough to go in and finish the Gulf War once and for all (basically what we did in 2003 war)
http://www.cnn.com/WORLD/9609/11/iraq/
etc etc etc!!
can you see the BIg Picture....?
clouds of bad times coming and all he cared about was blow jobs from a teen girl???
and now we pay for it in this times!
I blame him mainly for the mess today!!!
2007-11-26 19:32:38
·
answer #8
·
answered by Krytox1a 6
·
1⤊
4⤋