2007-11-26 18:23:46 · 4 answers · asked by MusicLuvr 5 in Society & Culture ➔ Royalty
Winston Churchill perhaps; both lead the country in times of uncertain victory in war.
2007-11-26 18:33:17 · answer #1 · answered by Trajan 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
None, she reigned over the English version of the Renaissance. She dedicated herself to her country to the exclusion of her personal succession and was party to fratricide to maintain religious independence from the European politicized catholics. There have been none so individually involved, although Queen Victoria reigned over another period of mini Renaissance and imperialism.
Queen Elizabeth 11 demonstrates the same zeal for dedication but is limited by constitutional law and has a greater admiration for and by all her subjects, domestic and foreign.
2007-11-27 02:38:05 · answer #2 · answered by kellring 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
She's like all the past ones in as much as she is dead
2007-11-27 02:29:48 · answer #3 · answered by brainstorm 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
DO your own homework.
Don't have Yahoo! answers,
do your work for you.
and I Agree, the fact that she's dead.
2007-11-27 02:32:45 · answer #4 · answered by English Dream 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋