You wouldn't have any because they would be free and so you wouldn't own them. So, the answer is zero. You have zero birds.
But if you let one fly away and he came back to you, then in a sense he is yours because he chose you so you would have one bird. So the answer is one.
But if he came back to you and the two birds in the bush (who are also NOT yours-unless you set them free first-which you didn't), were hawks and they flew forward and snatched him from your hand and tore him in half and gobbled him up as they flew away then you would have none again.
So the answer is zero. You have zero birds.
2007-11-26 18:26:22
·
answer #1
·
answered by TAP 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
2
2007-11-26 18:19:38
·
answer #2
·
answered by destinygirl918 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
3-1=2 birds
2007-11-26 18:21:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
if it was the bird in the hand that flew away you would have zero for the two in the bush are free.
if it was one of the birds in the bush that flew away you would still have one the other in the bush is still free.
2007-11-26 18:29:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by Papa WILL 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
none..
cause i let the bird in my hand flew away...
and once the one in my hand flew away, those in the bush will also fly with him...
2007-11-26 18:28:04
·
answer #5
·
answered by kyrios 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
You would have zero in any case.
You don't have the birds in the bush, because well, they are in the bush.
So the only one that could fly away would be the one in hand.
Which still leaves zero.
2007-11-26 18:33:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
2.... this is tricky...
u said HAD & FLEW so meaning that one's already gone... so only d ones on d bush r left
2007-11-26 19:54:55
·
answer #7
·
answered by 2D1iLuV 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
0 B/C YOU ONLY HAVE 1 IN YOUR HAND. THE OTHER"S IN THE BUSH. lol
2007-11-26 20:10:25
·
answer #8
·
answered by devine_secrets34 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
2 birds, and a hand full of bird poo.
2007-11-26 18:20:07
·
answer #9
·
answered by nytebreid 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
2???
2007-11-26 18:32:07
·
answer #10
·
answered by anna 7
·
1⤊
0⤋