History question (Constitution)??

Question

I'm having some trouble with one of the questions in my history, if anyone could be of any assistance, I would highly appreciate it. Thanks in advance, if you answer.

Under the new Constitution, the ability to make laws was...
(A.) Given mostly to the states.
(B.) Awarded to the state and federal governments.
(C.) Shared by the state and federal governments.
(D.) Given directly to all Americans.

Please, if you can answer this, please do. If you have the right answer, I'll immediately give you the points.

Answer 1

c

Answer 2

C. The ability to make laws was shared by the state and federal governments.

Answer 3

The legislative branch tests the two the administrative and the judicial branch via its potential to question and do away with from place of work any member of those branches under the striking circumstances. The legislature additionally has a ability of checking those branches, via fact it has the potential to applicable or no longer applicable money interior the federal funds for the different branches to function. If Congress would not provide those branches the money they should perform then those operation could be curtailed. The legislative branch tests the executives potential to act in specific areas consisting of making treaties and appointing ambassadors and judges under the "suggestion and Consent" clause. the administrative's treaties and appointments must be authorized via the Senate before they are effective. The legislature has yet another examine on the judicial branch via fact it has the potential to create or no longer create courts different than the ideal court docket. Congress may even exchange the form of justices on the ideal court docket if it desires to. the administrative has a examine on the legislative branch via having the potential to veto law it deems is irrelevant, undertaking to the striking of Congress to override the veto on a vote of two/3 of the individuals. the administrative has an implied examine on the judicial branch, via fact the judicial branch desires the administrative branch to enforce its rulings. without the tension of hands and police powers of the administrative branch, judicial decrees might unenforceable and valueless. the administrative has the potential to reserve Congress to convene notwithstanding if that's needed. The judicial branch has no specific tests on the different branches interior the form, notwithstanding it does have the potential of "judicial evaluation." that's the potential to be certain notwithstanding if a regulation or government action is or isn't constitutional. If the ruling is that that's unconstitutional, the regulation or action will become null and void. This potential won't be able to be exercised on the whim of the the judicial branch. it ought to study the regulation on condition that it comes before the court docket in a real case. The judicial branch would possibly no longer even provide an advisory opinion. There are extra tactics the branches work together with one yet another.

Answer 4

Originally, the ONLY laws the federal government was able to enact were those SPECIFICALLY outlined in the constitution. Everything else was the jurisdiction of the States.

Answer 5

definately not D...not A either...It's hard to tell the difference between B and C...but it's one of those definately, I would say C.