Iraq was meant to break Iraq into three parts ON PURPOSE to make Iraq more manageable.
2007-11-26 15:54:34 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
http://undertheradarmedia.blogspot.com/
2007-11-26 15:54:47 · update #1
Tillman was in Afghanistan, not Iraq...
2007-11-27 05:27:39 · answer #1 · answered by Pfo 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
because of the fact this is an oxymoron. conflict is terror. i'm shocked this is maximum effectual supporters can say the word with a right this moment face, and appalled that it keeps to be time-honored. Have human beings lost all potential to think of logically? The "conflict on terror." turn into on no account something extra suitable than a conceal for unparalleled enlargement of govt ability, and a purpose for the invasion of Iraq, which had not something to do with terror and each little thing to do with money for the militia-business complicated, Halliburton and Exxon.
2016-12-10 06:51:28 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As far as I know, Pat Tillman never stepped foot in Iraq.
So just what would he know about iraq ?
2007-11-26 16:41:27 · answer #3 · answered by jeeper_peeper321 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
It's just a question. The Tillman family is claiming foul just for the record!
2007-11-26 16:35:04 · answer #4 · answered by Soul Man 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Oh I see you found a reputable "news" source. 2 sentences on 2 totally different subjects. With no fact to back them up. Can you quote one factual unbiased story about Tillman? I doubt it severely.
2007-11-26 16:00:34 · answer #5 · answered by smsmith500 7 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Yeah right, Pat Tillman was going to come out and say that the war on Terror was a fraud and everybody was going to believe him more than everybody else. Then why not execute all those who purport to "expose" the war on terror.
2007-11-26 16:02:53 · answer #6 · answered by callAspadeAspade 2 · 3⤊ 4⤋
That is pretty low. Saying the military set Tillman up to be killed. Why don't you blame the real killers, Al Qaeda instead of those trying to defend you.
2007-11-26 16:18:42 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 2⤋
As a soldier, what and how could Pat Tilman have possibly known anything of significance? Take of the tinfoil hat before it cooks your brain (it may be too late already).
2007-11-26 16:05:22 · answer #8 · answered by Freedom Guy 4 · 6⤊ 1⤋
You mean like Vince Foster was executed because he was about to expose Bill's affair with Monica before his second term?
2007-11-26 16:09:08 · answer #9 · answered by citizenvnfla 4 · 6⤊ 1⤋
Mr Smartypants. you are so full of yourself. He was killed by friendly fire. They should have told the truth. Guess you are so smart, you didn't see the interview that they did before he was killed. You are a true nit wit.
2007-11-26 17:08:37 · answer #10 · answered by Sasha 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋