http://livingroomcandidate.movingimage.us/
2007-11-26 15:14:38 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Yes I think Amnesty No and Tigger are right they really go for the worse stuff they can do. Also that do appeal to the lower denominator as she said.
Although Sen. Obama has brought some credibility back with his commercial of the lady that doesn't wear much, I can see the symbolism there.
Actually I like the ones that really lie and that way you can make your mind of and say, "Any idiot that would believe that might vote for ____, but not me" So those kind of commercials make it easier to cull the group. You would think with all the money they could come up with something like Superbowl commercials, by I am sure many get a kickback from the advertising agancies. Let's see $100,000,000 @ 5% equals 5 millon the side, not bad.
Take care.
2007-11-26 15:33:12 · answer #1 · answered by R J 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is a lot of dirty pool today. With the ability of a third party to raise money to put up ads full of out and out lies about candidates, they are hoping we fall hook, line, and sinker for their lies.
The ads are all negative. They are also backstabbing.
I tend to ignore all of them.
2007-11-26 15:21:36 · answer #2 · answered by Tigger 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i does not have replaced my vote for McCain. although he grow to be no longer my first selection. Why the GOP moved him to the top is previous me. I voted for Fred Thompson interior the primaries yet he did no longer get his voice till he sponsored out. As for Obama, I researched each and every thing i ought to to establish approximately him such as my die stressful Democrat kinfolk in Illinois. of direction they voted for him because of the fact they simply vote democrat, era. yet in asking what has he executed for Illinois, Chicago etc. None ought to call one element they knew of. He on no account had a genuine interest, on no account ran a organization, voted latest on a similar time as being Jr. State Senator, destroyed his opposition to get that unopposed place. Then served 123 days as U.S. Senator which while campaigning he mentioned he grow to be no longer working for President yet in easy terms took 123 days to alter his ideas. particularly than stepping down on a similar time as he grow to be working for Pres. he took the pay human beings Senator yet grow to be no longer there. each and every element else approximately him is an entire secret. He lies too lots for me.
2016-12-16 19:22:57 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
TV ads are more expensive! Campaigns are much nastier!
2007-11-26 15:17:27 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Well more people have TV's, and of course they did go to color a while back.
2007-11-27 07:48:55 · answer #5 · answered by G-gal 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They are targeting a more ignorant audience.
2007-11-26 15:21:36 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋