2007-11-26 15:04:29 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Ron Paul (aka. Dr. No)
One reason is fiscal responsiblity. He is known as Dr. No because:
1. He is a medical Dr.
2. He votes no on all unconstitutional spending.
living within your means is sustainable...uncontrolled spending and debt and deficits are not sustainable...and would bankrupt the country.
2007-11-26 15:15:06 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
My favorite this time arount is Barak Obama. He is good for America. When dealing with the end and aftermath of a war we need a leader who can unite America. Obama's main competition in the primaries, Hillary, can't do that because there are already too many people who absolutely refuse to like her, no matter what she does they seem to have been trained by their friends and family that she is "bad." Several polls sugest that Obama leads all candidates (R or D) when it comes to the people's perception of his honesty, integrity, and comfort level. People are comfortable with him and he is a likable guy. Next, he will be good for our international reputation, which has been ruined by the Bush-Cheney administration and their "war on terror." Because of his likability, Obama can attract positive attention to America by foreign governments. Also, his policy is tough and right-on. He will end the war, he will relieve America of our deficit (not necessarliy by raising taxes sky-high, but by adjusting government spending so that we aren't wasting money on unnecessary and inefficient projects). He will reform education, give all American's the Healthcare that they are entitled to, and he has a specific plan to solve out social security problem. He stands up for the lower and middle class, and fights for the rights of all Americans, rich or poor, sick or healthy, young or old, native or immigrant, black or white or latino or asian. He has a plan for every problem America is facing right now and he knows what he has to do to make it work. Many people question his experience, but he actually has plenty. He was a law professor, community organizer, and a civil rights lawyer; he was in the Illinois state legislature for years, and currently he is in the US Senate. He has just enough experience to know how to play the game, but not too much that it has corrupted him. He is also one of the only candidates from either party to refuse to accept money (bribes) from special interest groups and Washington lobyists, therefore he is obliged to make decisions that are good for America, not good for the industries that gave him money (examples: pharmaceutical, oil, tobacco, etc.). He knows what is good for America and is not afraid of the change that must be implimented to see that good surface.
2007-11-26 23:31:52 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
ron paul!!! Less government, and more of everyone for themselves! Thats my kinda government. Leave me the hell alone, and I will decide when I want to give to charity.
Hes gonna get rid of the IRS, and FEMA which is sorry anyways. The military can pick up the slack there. A return to isolationism would be great. I do not want to police the world any more. Lets break away from the UN, those people are nothing but trouble. Pull our troops out of Japan. Why they hell cant they have a military but Iraq can? They are too advanced to do the crazy stuff they did before.
2007-11-26 23:08:11 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
I still havent made my decsion about which one would benefit the people and the country just yet. Im looking for the one i believe will have the most "unifying" effect on the nation not the one who makes the most "promises" to the people.
2007-11-26 23:09:20 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I think Barack Obama's the best choice. I think he's one of the only candidates who gives a d**n about the common person and about the future of this country. I don't think he'll be able to fix everything in his first term, but he will get re-elected on his merits.
2007-11-26 23:28:05 · answer #5 · answered by KIZIAH 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Ron Paul.
Ron Paul will end the endless undeclared wars around the world. He will restore our freedoms that the Neo Cons and Liberals have taken away.
He will restore prosperity by trimming government down to its Constitutionally authorized functions, eliminating many of our taxes and restoring sound money.
A Ron Paul election means the end of the New World Order.
2007-11-27 01:45:14 · answer #6 · answered by iraqisax 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Ron Paul , most truthful and trustful and won't get in bed with Special Interest Groups and will follow the Constitution , bring the troops home and CLOSE THE BORDERS .
2007-11-26 23:10:16 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Tell you the truth, I think they all suck. But I do focus on the negativity of there campaign. Obama is too in\experienced. I'd like to see Clinton in there but she has a vagina and so many people are against that. Who knows...im waitin' for the prick that says Giuliani. HE BACKED BY THE MOB! HOW DO YOU THINK HE BECAME MAYOR?! lol
2007-11-26 23:09:02 · answer #8 · answered by Shorty 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Since it can't be Lou Dobbs, Tancredo and Paul are possibilities.
Hillary wears a cup because life's too tough. She and Obama voted for the McCain/Kennedy Shamnesty immigration bill and voted NO to making English our national language.
Bad move Demo's.
2007-11-26 23:40:14 · answer #9 · answered by Bambi 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Hillary Clinton has the intelligence and experience to make America great again.
VOTE for your choice as US President on my 360 degrees blog and know who will likely win.
2007-11-27 00:09:14 · answer #10 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋