BCS sucks everyone knows that. Here's a great solution.
6 teams get in. Top 4 conference winning teams get in. Not BCS because that is completely made up, rather the 4 highest rated teams who won their conference. Next 2 highest ranked teams also get in. We can keep the current ranking system or get a new one I don't care.
Top 2 teams get a bye. You use the existing bcs bowls as the first, second and championship round games. Keep the other bowls for non playoff teams.
The only other thing is timing. Don't let any game be played after the Thanksgiving weekend, i.e. that would be conference championships (which would get great tv ratings on thanksgiving). First round of the playoffs is the 2nd week of Dec. Second round is the 3rd week. And the Championship is on or around New Year's day. Other bowls can be whenever is best.
If you can't win your conference or be in the top 2 you don't really deserve National Championship. And it would make more money.
2007-11-26 13:59:16 · 7 answers · asked by bcs sucks 1 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
Everyone says money, this would make more money. How could it not? 5 important games instead of 1. How could it not make more money???
2007-11-26 14:11:20 · update #1
To defend my idea again people like mr z who can't read. You still get the Championship game on or around New Years. And you can change the dates if you really want to, those were just a suggestion. But again how is this not better and worth more $?
2007-11-26 15:37:12 · update #2
How will it not make more money?
Let's see, which game is going to get more viewers, a game in the middle of December or one held on New Year's day, let's see, hmmmmm?
2007-11-26 14:56:02 · answer #1 · answered by Mr_Z 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would love a playoff system. I would invite all the conference champions to the playoffs just like they do in college basketball. Once there are 8 teams left, use the same bowls they use now for the bcs games.
2007-11-26 14:30:16 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Its a good idea, but there is to much money involved in the bowls, thats why we dont have a playoff. It isnt because no one could come up with a solution.
2007-11-26 14:05:11 · answer #3 · answered by Michael W 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Too few teams. Need to have 16 teams, not 6.
2007-11-26 18:04:35 · answer #4 · answered by TheOnlyBeldin 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it is going to be the the appropriate option 8 to sixteen communities play interior the playoff and something bypass to bowl video games. each of the sponsors of the bowl video games that are gotten rid of can sponsor a playoff pastime or perchance even 2 playoff video games.
2016-12-30 05:00:45 · answer #5 · answered by jun 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
that is great and it isnt taking that much money cause it is only 6 teams soo i think ur idea is great
2007-11-26 14:12:14 · answer #6 · answered by Chris 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
go usc
2007-11-26 14:04:41 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋