English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

VIEW ONE: Shareholders bear the risks and should have the final say on how public companies are run.

VIEW TWO: Modern competitive conditions require a 'stakeholder' approach to running public companies.

VIEW THREE: The only way business and communities can develop together is if businesses are owned and run by the communities they are in.

2007-11-26 10:48:53 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Education & Reference Homework Help

3 answers

1 = yes, that's known as Capitalism, and (so far) it's the best thing we have.

2 = yes (the 'stakeholders' == shareholders .. i.e. the Company Directors should all have significant shareholdings in the Company)

3 = only on a (very) small scale .. for example, a local "Farmers shop" might work .. (right up to the point where a multi-national giant with massive economies of scale and buying power eg. Asda, opened an 'out of town super store ...)

Otherwise, no, don't be stupid = it sounds good but does not actually work (it was tried in the (former) Soviet Union) ..

No 'local' community could raise sufficient capital to supply themselves with even the very basics of modern life (eg. Hospital, Power Station. Water Works, Oil Refinery ..) ... they would be back to the horse & cart (sorry, no car factory), no roads . .. no TV or radio stations .. no mobile phones ... no newspapers, no books ...

It's just possible a local community could fund a school (but I wonder who would build it .. after all, where do you think bricks come from ?) ... we would be back, in fact, to the 'dark ages' ..

2007-11-26 20:14:03 · answer #1 · answered by Steve B 7 · 0 0

Somet issues i seem at think of...huh how might desire to they do this, its incorrect and might deliver approximately all varieties of complications. (only like the Youtube advert.) yet nonetheless it turn into extra subject-unfastened for a baby to confirm they have been observed in later in existence without desire of looking their Nfamily because of the fact of fears from some adoptive father and mom. (not couple, some even glided by ability of their very own instincts approximately and have been truthful with their childrens from the initiating.) Is it only that there's a technologies delivered it out in the open what some everyone seems to be arranged to do to get a sprint one. Yeah i think of so. decrease back in the BSE it turn into all stored under wraps. Even loads of AP's did not comprehend what went on hospitals and how babies have been taken from their mothers. a number of them have been lied to besides. at present there is not any genuine excuse for being unethical (nonetheless not being knowledgeable of the outcomes adoption could have on a baby) or ignorant whilst going into adoption. the suggestion is there, so are books and different learn approximately adoption and what's seen ethical. No 'advertising' turn into utilized in our adoption-relatives protection comes first. Its seen the final determination, not the 1st.

2016-12-10 06:41:02 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Create a three ring venn diagram then evaluate your findings

2007-11-26 10:53:53 · answer #3 · answered by others.o.o.o 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers