2007-11-26 10:19:52 · 10 answers · asked by Ignatz Mouse 3 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
The good news, so that i would have a few more seconds to live than the that of the other option.
2007-11-26 10:39:33 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would like to hear the bad news first cause then at least maybe the good news would cheer me up
2007-11-26 18:39:04 · answer #2 · answered by psyko_kittie12 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bad news first, get it over with, then the good news, maybe it will make things a bit better, or erase the bad news altogether!
2007-11-26 19:17:30 · answer #3 · answered by inkgddss 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bad news first because the good news can cheer you up after
2007-11-26 18:27:33 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
If i have a choice i want to hear both of them at the same times, but i have no choice so let me hear the bad news first so i have something good left to hear.
2007-11-26 22:02:45 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't have to fix good news.
Tell me the bad news first.
2007-11-26 21:16:19 · answer #6 · answered by Phoenix Quill 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The good news because then if I died before the bad news could be spread I'd die with something good in mind.
2007-11-26 18:52:21 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would want the bad news first because the good news could definantly weigh out the bad.
2007-11-26 18:30:00 · answer #8 · answered by TwinD 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
good news...usually nobody says that unless the news is something real bad..the good news after real bad news, doesn't seem as good..
...and the good news can prepare you for the bad.
2007-11-26 18:31:19 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
the bad news so ill have something to make me feel better
2007-11-26 18:27:28 · answer #10 · answered by SeanL 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋