English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

14 answers

If the charges are bettering the economy, making this a safer nation, raising morals and values in this nation, then I am all for it.

2007-11-26 08:11:42 · answer #1 · answered by mustagme 7 · 1 6

Impeachable offense could be proven in a couple days... But the Dem's are scared that people who don't pay attention to politics will see it as a political stunt in revenge for Clinton. They don't want that kind of spin in the up coming election year. Do I agree with this no. Do I see their motives to be this way. Sadly yes!

2007-11-26 18:10:41 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I think he should for starting this ILLEGAL war.

He LIED to congress adn tthe American People to get us in there and now he refuses to leave.

We went over there for 2 reason:

To Find WMD and to get Sadam and both have been completed.

I don't know if charges can be presses but we should ahve started Impeachment process a long itme ago.

2007-11-26 16:47:50 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

If there is substance to your charge that he is a criminal--why have no charges been brought up? Is it fun living an empty and bitter life?

2007-11-26 17:10:07 · answer #4 · answered by Mountain Dew 88 3 · 0 1

if you ask me, the fact that he never testified about 9/11, under oath or alone, is just one reason in a long line of reasons; including treason for outing a CIA operative, also going to war without ever declaring war and based on false intelligence.

2007-11-26 16:20:43 · answer #5 · answered by spillmind 4 · 2 0

re your deleted question about Laura Bush, could you imagine, it would be like pulling apart a grilled cheese sandwich while smelling a can of tuna!!!! I'm sure some people are into it.

2007-11-26 16:18:52 · answer #6 · answered by wtfsept11 2 · 1 0

charges of what?

if for TREASON then I am all it if it is against Pelosi and Reid.

2007-11-26 16:17:59 · answer #7 · answered by Samm 6 · 1 2

Such as ?

Or will anything do to keep the "lib woodrow" going.

2007-11-26 16:31:10 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

yes. But he wont allow himself to be questioned under oath..so.....

2007-11-26 16:11:27 · answer #9 · answered by ? 6 · 3 2

Of course not. He has the will of God behind his every decision.

2007-11-26 16:24:27 · answer #10 · answered by Lou 6 · 0 4

fedest.com, questions and answers