I was offer 2 great jobs both with relocation one to Los Angeles and another one to San Francisco helpmechoose

Question

Hello

I hope you can all help me make up my mind on this one

I am a recent Physician Assistant grad and I was offer 2 great opportunities both six figures positions, one in LA and another one in San Francisco. I have been in SF before and I love it however never been in LA before.

What are the pros vs cons for both cities and wich one do you prefer over the other one.

How about cost of living, dating scene, outdoors recreational activities, housing.

I really need your feedback and I thank you all before hand

Answer 1

If the money is right...go with SF....I have visited up there and my husband does business up there too. We live in the greater LA area.

The weather is nice here, but the overall feel is very plastic and superficial....I have been told by locals, and even people from there that now live here that it is far more preferable than here. I think the people are more intellectual and less influenced by the entertainment industry. There more cultural type stuff. My husband has also made these observations as well. I think SF is more scenic than LA. And you are closer to alot more forested areas....northern CA is one of the most scenic areas I have heard people talk about. You are closer to Yosemite and Lake Tahoe which are breathtaking areas. Not to mention wine country and all the cultural and festival type things that go with that.

It is more expensive in SF than LA....but if it is just you, maybe it wouldnt be that big of a difference.

To me, LA is ok to visit, but I wouldnt want to stay. It is not too pretty and it is just miles and miles of highways connecting one burb to another and most of it is not attractive from the highway. The beaches are ok, but once you have seen one, they all kinda look the same. What mostly surrounds the LA area is desert, and dry brushy brownish mountains. Now once you get out further west of LA....like out hwy 101 past the valley and into Calabasas....then it is more pristine.

Hope that helps, ...best of luck to you with your job offers and decision.

Answer 2

Cost of Living:

After New York City, San Francisco is the second most expensive city in the nation. And Los Angeles is third on the list. So, while L.A. is slightly more affordable, the difference is not that significant.

Dating Scene:

San Francisco is mostly singles rather than families. After the wedding, most young couples move to suburbs in the East Bay or South Bay. L.A. is probably more rounded in terms of the family versus single ratio. Intelligence is definitely a big bonus in San Francisco. The folks in L.A. care more about grooming and appearance. Both cities care equally about money / materialism though.

Outdoors and recreation:

It really depends on what you're looking for, as climate plays a huge role in recreational activity. Los Angeles is well suited for warm weather sports, especially swimming, surfing, golf, and volleyball. San Francisco excels at mountain biking, jogging, hiking, and (thanks to proximity to Lake Tahoe) skiing. Both cities have professional teams for basketball, hockey, and baseball. But Greater L.A. does not have an NFL team, even though the San Francisco region has two.

Housing:

You'll have more options in Los Angeles. Geographically, San Francisco is only slighter larger than Manhattan. The apartment blocks and townhouses are almost as dense too. A single-family home is the norm in L.A., while in San Francisco it's a luxury. In other words, you can forget about having a private pool or lawn in San Francisco. The city does try to compensate with two huge public parks (Golden Gate and Presidio), however.

Answer 3

See a celeb; glass a beverage on a beach bar at sunset; wear a pair of custom sneakers within an ultra-luxurious store in Beverly Hills; enjoy at Universal Studios Hollywood theme park, discover world-class museums, or party the night time away in a starlet-filled club…..this are just someof the things you will see in Los Angeles, find that town with hotelbye . Los Angeles is the California's liveliest city; may be the entertainment capital of America, with megastar electricity and unlimited activities. Hollywood is the most-see attractions in Los Angeles. This place attracts millions of readers each year who travel there to cover gratitude with their beloved stars and possibly even get a view of a few popular personalities. And often they are fortunate!

Answer 4

After reading your other questions I have to wonder if you just ask random questions full of lies.

9 months ago you were asking about whether you should go to school to become a physician assistant and now you say you are a recent graduate. There is no way you could have graduated in 9 months!

2 months ago you were asking about the outlook on becoming a merchant marine.

2 months ago you were asking about Portland in which you stated that you currently lived in Los Angeles, but here you state you have never been to Los Angeles.

Basically you are just wasting people's time since they think they are actually providing info you need.

Answer 5

According to PlacesRated.com, San Francisco is the 2nd-best place to live - LA does not make the top 10.

Been to both for visits - would choose SF over LA in a heartbeat.

Answer 6

San Francisco's better... even my friends in LA agree that SF is way better. It's more compact, accessible, prettier, more nature/wildlife, etc...

However, nothing personal, but... the last thing we need in San Francisco is another person who makes 6 figures and uses the phrase "dating scene". I mean... I stay out of the Marina for that very reason. Nothing against that, mind you... but it's definitely not what this city is traditionally about (but is quickly becoming).

Answer 7

both being large cities there is equally alot to do in each. san francisco is alot more expensive than l.a . so really you should base your decision on the income you will be making. if you will make under 25 bucks an hour forget about san francisco. you'll never get to buy a home and to rent one would take all your money. on the other hand l.a really sucks

Answer 8

San Fran is a nicer city, not as spread out, L.A. the weather is better if you like sunny and warm.
Both have traffic problems, the cost of living in L.A. is less.
The social outlook would be about the same.

Answer 9

I suggest SF. It's beautiful, clean, and the people are nice. You can find a lot of culture (ballet, symphony) and you're near wine country (30 minutes away). I love it here!

Answer 10

SF def, the city is clean, safe and people are nise- plus you are so close to everything. The whole bay area is awesome and you can do anything you want. Its expensive but def worth it