English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-11-26 07:56:47 · 5 answers · asked by grafjunkie 2 in News & Events Current Events

5 answers

From that very first day (9-11-01) I believed our government had participated in (or at least knew about) that tragedy. It set the stage for an unconstitutional, illegal, unjustified attack against Iraq (another sovereign nation that in no way threatened, provoked or attacked the United States). It helped bail out a Bush family friend from millions of dollars in losses on office space he couldn't rent. It allowed Bush to lie to Congress, hoodwink a grief-stricken American public and con our valiant troops into believing there was honorable purpose in invading Iraq just so that a handful of wealthy elitists, oil barons, industrialists and power brokers could become wealthier and more powerful. It let Bush 'settle the score' against Hussein, and assuage a personal vendetta the Bush family had against Saddam ever since the days of Desert Storm when George H.W. Bush was criticized, ridiculed and humiliated for 'not finishing the job' and ousting Hussein at that time.
The steel was quickly used to build a new U.S. battleship instead of being stored for further, more intensive investigation. All in all, I think our government played a key role in the killing of 3,000 U.S. civilians. -RKO- 11/26/07

2007-11-26 08:57:57 · answer #1 · answered by -RKO- 7 · 1 2

Act of Terrorism.

Some supporting facts:

THE STEEL WAS NOT "RUSHED AWAY" (TO JAPAN OR ANYWHERE ELSE)

How the steel was handled was investigated by “ImplosionWorld,” the leading demolition journal in the world.

It has been completely verified that the steel was not “rushed away,” and you can see the results of the investigation in Point 6 at

http://www.implosionworld.com/Article-WTC%20STUDY%208-06%20w%20clarif%20as%20of%209-8-06%20.pdf

You will find a complete description of the way the steel was handled at each step.

Also, see how NIST (National Institute of Standards & Technology) analyzed the steel at:

NIST gallery of recovered steel & how it was analyzed
http://wtc.nist.gov/media/gallery.htm#recover

NIST NCSTAR 1-3: Mechanical and Metallurgical Analysis of Structural Steel
http://wtc.nist.gov/oct05NCSTAR1-3index.htm

2007-11-26 08:35:27 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I guess that depends on who you choose to believe. Our family lost three members on 9-11 and the majority of the family believes that it was the radical Muslims. A very small percentage thinks it was an inside job. They have a lot of evidence to prove their case. It's caused a rift in the family.
I still dont know what to believe.

2007-11-26 08:13:02 · answer #3 · answered by phlada64 6 · 0 0

We'll never know until there is a full investigation into the events of that day.

The Bush administration fought against any investigation for a long time and then finally allowed the dog and pony show investigation into ONLY the intelligence failures.

Unfortunately, the evidence was sent to Japan to be melted down for scrap.

2007-11-26 08:20:42 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

I find it incredible that anyone feels a need to even ask this question.

2007-11-26 08:12:07 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers