2007-11-26 07:27:58 · 20 answers · asked by razor 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Well, being the obvious Obama fan that I am, of course I would say he would make a better anything.
But let's take this question to the extreme, shall we?
Let's say that Obama is CURRENTLY smoking crack and Bush is clean as a whistle...
Does it make Bush's actions and procedure any better for the American people?
I think not.
Also, you do know about Bush's daughter and her recent meth binge with the gay folk singer, Rufus Wainright...
Addiction is a family disease...
I don't know if I could take the pressure of sharing a name with that man either.
2007-11-26 09:50:42 · answer #1 · answered by rabble rouser 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
To clairfy, Obama admitted to pot and cocaine.
I'm not sure it matters much to most voters anymore, so long as they're not current users. In Obama's case, my bet is that he figured it would come out anyway, so why not just admit it on the outset and take that away as an issue of him lying or covering it up.
2007-11-26 15:32:47 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
Oh I think not even anyone who drank a beer or touched a girl should be Commander in Chief.
I think only Methodist ministers or maybe a nun should be President.
I mean, Hitler and Stalin were nothing compared to a pot smoker! Such evil!
2007-11-26 16:07:16 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Obama also admitted cocaine use (that part must have slipped your mind) and just exactly what proof do you have of any drug use by President Bush? I've heard roumors but I've never seen anything in the way of proof.
2007-11-26 15:31:51 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Just to be clear: Obama admitted both recreational marijuana and cocaine use. President Bush lied about being, essentially, a coke-head for several years. Just to clarify.
2007-11-26 15:30:39 · answer #5 · answered by fredo 4 · 4⤊ 2⤋
There is no credible evidence of Bush drug use, or lies about it.
And Bush is not running in 2008.
2007-11-26 15:40:46 · answer #6 · answered by American citizen and taxpayer 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Bush is an addict and thats the reason for his faulty decision making .
He may not be using today but its his brain that made him use in the first place .
2007-11-26 15:32:22 · answer #7 · answered by TroubleMaker 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
We know Bush is an absolute failure at everything, so I have to say Obama.
2007-11-26 15:31:11 · answer #8 · answered by Zardoz 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Do you think Obama could actually do WORSE than Bush??
2007-11-26 15:31:07 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
When did Obama become president! Yoo hoo,earth to razor.
2007-11-26 15:31:08 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋