If you had to do it all again, would you marry for love or money?
Which way would you choose if you were rich?
Which would you choose if you were a poor single parent just barely making it by?
2007-11-26 07:03:19 · 21 answers · asked by babydoll32 2 in Family & Relationships ➔ Marriage & Divorce
Love for every question u just asked. Having money isnt everything. Plus, it doesnt bring happiness either.
2007-11-26 07:08:56 · answer #1 · answered by Beau 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
YES I married for love. I make twice as much money as my husband does. And I love the man even more than the day that I married him. We will be married 10 years next month. I stay with him, because he's a good, kind, decent, hard working guy who knows me inside & out. I couldn't have asked for a better mate & best friend. :)
2016-04-05 23:26:38 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
im currently married and a married my hubby for love and i dont regret it. However if something where to happen i wouldnt marry for love cuz i dont think would love someone the same and i would then marry for money so i could make me happy! If i was rich i would be very careful who i would marry. Single i think for love with a little money thrown in.
2007-11-26 07:26:36 · answer #3 · answered by Mari 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I prefer to be broke and happy then to be rich and miserable. So I would definitely marry for love. I feel if you marry for money then when money runs out you are just going to keep remarrying and be unstable. You should have your own money in the relationship anyway before you get married so you aren't living off of anyone elses assets.
2007-11-26 07:33:00 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I married for love and have stuck threw the thick and thin times and boy are we making it now! We have a deep love for each other my Husband has a thriving career at age 27 with more job security than most people would ever know or understand! He works so hard for us even if he was flat broke his dedication to our family is worth more than anything there is no sticker price for the love and togetherness we share and I wouldn't trade for anything in the world!
2007-11-26 07:48:55 · answer #5 · answered by Amberlyn 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neither.
I would marry to get into a relationship with someone who has values and goals that match mine. The rest will come.
I've seen some poor single parents make some awfully desperate decisions that they ended up regretting terribly.
2007-11-26 07:08:13 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
If I had it to do all over it would always be for Love.
If I was rich I would be incognito with that and would choose Love.
Love is what I would always choose no matter what because once you've found real Love you're already rich.
2007-11-26 07:12:20 · answer #7 · answered by uneekqamar2004 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I marry for both. The men I love have all been hard working, ambitious, able to make goals and reach them. Why settle for one or the other when you don't have to?
Love is great, but it doesn't pay the rent.
Money isn't much fun when you don't love the person you spend it with.
2007-11-26 07:08:37 · answer #8 · answered by janicajayne 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Confucius say, "When Poverty knock on door Love fly out window".
Or was that Charlie Chan?
If you are rich and unhappy - why blame the money? Unless, of course, your wealth came suddenly and you are a celebrity in sports or cinema.
2007-11-26 07:14:28 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am a poor single parent...and I would only ever marry for love, becuase love can only bring good things
2007-11-26 07:06:28 · answer #10 · answered by sweetnlow 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋