Since the health care is doing fine as it is should we privatized our military so investment groups can benefit?
2007-11-26 06:36:05 · 14 answers · asked by edubya 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Maybe Blackwater is a trial run.
2007-11-26 06:39:29 · answer #1 · answered by Zardoz 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
How about Military Health Care
2007-11-26 06:42:36 · answer #2 · answered by whirling W dervish 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
That's thinking outside the box buddy.
You are right Health Care is fine because it's not run by the government. If they ever get their greedy hands on it the quality will go down and the cost will go up.
Putting our military in the hands of private corporations just might make the quality (which is already great) go up and the cost go down
2007-11-26 06:47:07 · answer #3 · answered by Johnny 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
We are privatizing the military. See Blackwater USA.
Oops, that's a privatelty held corporation and investment groups can't profit, gotta love capitalism.
2007-11-26 06:43:34 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I disagree with your premise. Health care is not doing fine. And military and health care are not opposing issues. We have both, we need both. Both need to be and can be financed simultaneously without affecting the strength of the other.
2007-11-26 06:43:09 · answer #5 · answered by David M 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The military is a government responsibility and is extremely important. Healthcare is not and never has been a government responsibility, except for military health care. It is a private industry, as is health insurance. The individual consumer is responsible for paying for their health care consumption or for paying the insurance premiums covering individual consumption. Similarly, the consumer is responsible for providing transportation for himself and insurance coverage for his automobile.
2007-11-26 07:03:33 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Two part question. Which is more important is Military. That is really the main purpose of a centralized government, along with minting a common currency. As far as privatization of our military, that would lead to private armies and loss of centralized control, and also a loss of national secrets. Not a good idea at all.
2007-11-26 06:40:57 · answer #7 · answered by libsticker 7 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Your health care system is doing fine? What country do you live in?
2007-11-26 06:39:08 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The constitution provides for a military and not for health care. If the government weren't so involved in health care, and more importantly, the pharmaceutical industry, then health care would be more affordable and easily obtained.
2007-11-26 06:41:49 · answer #9 · answered by John 4 · 1⤊ 3⤋
protection. the authorities is Constitutionally mandated to grant protection. there is not any Constitutional grounding for a customary well-being care gadget, tremendously one which could fail besides. yet like maximum liberals you decrease back your arguments with feeling fairly than substance. you experience that really everyone must have authorities presented well-being care, yet there is not any logical or Constitutional potential for this reason.
2016-10-25 02:33:32 · answer #10 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The military is the proper function of the gvmt and is specified as that in the Constitution.
Health care is not Constitutional and should remain in private corporations.
2007-11-26 06:40:18 · answer #11 · answered by Dr Jello 7 · 5⤊ 2⤋