Yes! definatly! the first one was an overwhelming success so I don't see why not...The Simpsons Movie seemed like an excuse to do what they couldnt do in the show (homer middle finger, bart nude, etc.) and it was great so yeah!
2007-12-01 11:56:29
·
answer #1
·
answered by K 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. I think the Simpson's film should have happened 10 years before it did.
2007-11-26 13:50:25
·
answer #2
·
answered by Xia 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
Maybe in a few years.
2007-11-26 21:09:37
·
answer #3
·
answered by Judas Rabbi 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Nah, i expected so much from the film that it failed to meet
2007-11-26 13:52:43
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
No, there should have never been one to begin with.
2007-11-26 13:50:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋
No. One is enough.
2007-11-26 14:02:15
·
answer #6
·
answered by ilovesam2907 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
yeah it be hilarious
2007-11-26 13:49:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by Ashley 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
they should not. one was more than enough!
2007-11-26 13:51:49
·
answer #8
·
answered by collegecutie89 2
·
2⤊
2⤋
YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES
YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES
2007-11-26 13:52:27
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
they should
2007-11-26 13:49:23
·
answer #10
·
answered by Mag 7
·
1⤊
2⤋