English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Current Iraqi government is working a deal (trying to) in which;in exchange for a continued U.S.military presence,the Iraqi government will grant U.S.companies a favorable business climate in Iraq.Your thoughts?
Source is todays Yahoo News.

2007-11-26 05:26:52 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

6 answers

hehe...Interesting request, especially coming from the same Iraqi government that the Left keeps exclaiming 'hates us so much' ; )

EDIT: Sorry DSTR but a freely elected government is never a form of puppet government. Unless of course youre another ultra left liberal loon who lives his life believing in one conspiracy after another...which is my guess.

2007-11-26 05:31:19 · answer #1 · answered by vinny_says_relax 7 · 3 5

That's what the war was about anyways...now they come out of the closet.

EDIT:
Vinny get a clue the Iraqi government is nothing more than a rubber stamp for Bush, they are in fact a puppet government,.

The corporate hooligans go on with their shenanigans, calling for war today on anyone that disagrees with Imperial America and diverting the public's call for accountability.

America's fixation with finding, defining and redefining enemies, a continuous string of someone else to demonize, fulfills the prophecy of the foreign minister of the now defunct Soviet Union, Eduard Schevernadze. In response to the possible dissolution of his country, Schevernadze said that the U.S. had better be careful what it wishes for. That someday, "we will deny you your enemy."

Our fixation with other nations possessing "weapons of mass destruction" comes from a superpower complex that involves its own guilt. It is a projection of our own past misdeeds onto the worldwide canopy of the other. We call those who would amass weapons of mass destruction as being part of an "axis of evil". Yet, we, are the only nation on planet Earth which has actually used nuclear weapons, used them against not one, but two, civilian targets: Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Then, there is depleted uranium. While we scour the Earth for foreign dictators (only unfriendly ones) who possess biological warfare agents, we ignore our own research and stockpiles. We define rogue states as those possessing nuclear weapons of mass destruction and who have not signed the nuclear non-proliferation treaty. Yet, to our biggest recipient of aid, Israel, who has amassed 400 nuclear weapons and who also has not signed the nuclear non-proliferation treaty, we give our blessing, and our money -- money that can then be used to further buy weaponry from us.

2007-11-26 13:31:22 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 5 2

aaaaand your point being?? you wanna give Iran or Syria that opportunity? or how about the many other nations that folded under pressure that were supposed to be our allies?? get real.... and for those of you that say this is what was in the works all along and the main reason we invaded to begin with... you people are always looking for a reason other than what is right in front of you aren't ya?? laughable and disheartening is what i would use to describe that line of thought... spending tooooo much time on the conspiracy websites eh? go to work...

2007-11-26 13:37:27 · answer #3 · answered by jasonsluck13 6 · 2 2

The Iraqis ought to asssume both points and hire Blackwater to provide their security...

Please remember, our initial Invasion was based upon the premise we would get "favorable business climate" for US and other Coalition corporations.

2007-11-26 13:35:05 · answer #4 · answered by outcrop 5 · 3 2

That has been the next step all along. We will end up with a permanent troop deployment much like South Korea, Japan, and Germany.

2007-11-26 13:34:48 · answer #5 · answered by mjmayer188 7 · 3 2

Was there ever any doubt? This is all part of the bigger picture.

2007-11-26 13:35:09 · answer #6 · answered by gone 7 · 2 2

fedest.com, questions and answers