2007-11-26 04:40:05 · 15 answers · asked by realitycheck 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No, she'll claim she supported him all along. Then someone will play the video of her opposing him. Then she won't do any press availabilities until people stop talking about it.
2007-11-26 04:47:45 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
R.C., Just what the hell, have you been drinking, to even come up with such a question?? Hillary admit to making a mistake ?? Having to admit, and apologize to the General that protects her right ot be wrong as hell???
Hillary 'eat crow'???
Billary will simply do what she has done in the past when she is proven the fool (again) : She simply ignores the subject, and has the News Manglement Nitwit Networks present her pandering some more gullible folks !!!!
2007-11-26 14:06:14 · answer #2 · answered by I'M HERE 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I believe the stated purpose of the Surge, reference G. Bush, was to provide a grace period for the Iraq government to effect political reforms that would lead to a lessening of the civil war. As there have been no actions by the Iraq government, none, zero, nada, why shoudl she eat her words. I believe the former camander of US troops has just labeled it a complete failure.
What planet are you living on?
2007-11-26 12:51:23 · answer #3 · answered by sSuper critic 2 · 2⤊ 3⤋
No, she'll hold off commenting on it this year on the off chance that she will win the WH and be able to take credit for it at that time.
2007-11-27 04:40:33 · answer #4 · answered by wider scope 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
At 2 billion a week, I would hope something successful will come out of us having to pay for it, for the next 3 generations.
But killing half their population just to reduce violence wasn't exactly the plan.
2007-11-26 12:53:13 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
The people I see eating their words are the people who leave the Bush administration and publicly admit to what a disaster the Bush term in office has been.
I don't see Iraq becoming a tourist destination any time soon. BTW people could safely vacation in Iraq before the war. And I'd never send my children to the Middle East to help "liberate the Iraqi people"
2007-11-26 12:47:19 · answer #6 · answered by Honest Opinion 5 · 2⤊ 6⤋
SHE WILL NEVER ADMIT TO THAT. THEY ARE SLOWLY
GETTING THINGS GOING IN IRAQ. REMEMBER IT TOOK A FEW YEARS BEFORE THIS COUNTRY GOT IT RIGHT.
2007-11-26 14:11:46 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hasn't she lied about enough already without her lying about these things too?
2007-11-26 12:59:59 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Isn't that cute, another basher. That’s so cute. I guess your candidate who is so unimpressive that you can't tell me what he stands for....or who he is...
It's easier to smash down a contender than to build up a nobody.
2007-11-26 13:08:01 · answer #9 · answered by Jason W 2 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Try to remember that the purpose of the "surge" was to allow political reconciliation to take place. It has not taken place. I would not be so fast to call it a success.
2007-11-26 12:45:21 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 5⤋