She flip flops on every issue, her only clame to fame is that she was married to Mr. Clinton. She is very butch looking and never wears a dress. She has no experiance in running anything. She says that her time in the White House qualifies her but I worked for a college for 16 years but that dont qalify me to be a proffesor. What are her qualifications?
2007-11-26 04:29:43 · 34 answers · asked by sparky 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
She has been a Senator for 8(?) years, and a successful one at that. Her experiences as first lady and presidential confidant gives her more experience in the White House than either George Bush or any of the Republicans running.
You may rant all you want, but you cannot change the facts.
2007-11-26 04:33:49 · answer #1 · answered by buffytou 6 · 7⤊ 9⤋
damned right , she is, just remember how the conomy is in the toilet right now.it is a proven fact across the country in most situations, the man may make the money, but he leaves it up to his darling at home to take good care of the budget.
now, i know most of you out there were just like me when bill clinton was president and the feelings personally about him, but putting that aside, he did creat a robust economy and was the first president in history to not only balance the budget, but pay downwards on the debt and the stock market was great, unemployment was low and he kept a check on the value of the dollar, so what does this mean?, his pillow partner will be hillary and yes, lots of advice, but he will make sure that she gets the credit.now for the people she is running against, how many of them look really healthy in your eyes? how many of them are as smart as hillary or has an m.b.a. degree? you decide !
2007-11-26 09:10:58 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Sparky you know what you call flip flopping is a necessary evil for politicians.They have to cope up with the fast moving dynamics of the political scenario. It is hundred times better than people who bluff all the way with their lies.
Of course one can avoid answering a question instantly by being diplomatic. If it is a case of voting. then some avoid voting offering some lame excuses. She does not do that.
As far as her qualifications are concerned just only few days back , President Bush and First Lady Laura Bush recognize and make it public that she is the best among all president hopefuls to measure up to the pressures of Presidency and the White House. Former French President Chirac's wife was all praise for Hillary and commends her candidacy.
2007-11-26 04:48:02 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 5⤋
In Spain, we know that yes, she is.
In Spain, we know too that the democracy in the United States is a "mierda", because only have two parties, the democratic and the republican. I think that the worst policy question in United States is the electoral law.
You cannot give all the congresists of a state to one party. For example, the Democratic Party win the 59 % of votes and the Republican Party win the 41 % of votes.
What's happen with the people that they voted to the Republican Party? They can't be representate in the Congress?
The think that you need is not a good president, the think that you need is a good electoral law, for example, the Hondt law
I can qualificate Mrs Clinton because she didn't win the power, at the moment...
Salutes
2007-11-26 04:48:17 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 4⤋
Just like Hillary said when Bill was running, "You Get Two For The Price Of One", There will be two great minds running the White House next year( Hopefully). The budget was balanced, millions of jobs created, welfare reform, to mention just a few.Bush had a personal axe to grind with Saddam, and got us in the worst mess this country has ever seen.It will take another Clinton to clean up after another Bush.
Republicans can wipe the foam from their mouths now!
2007-11-26 04:54:55 · answer #5 · answered by vinny 5 · 5⤊ 5⤋
HDNet Dec 1 DNC debate (Sat 7:30pm ET).
- all eight -
gravel kucinich paul nader
2007-11-28 23:51:16 · answer #6 · answered by NadePaulKuciGravMcKi 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Her looks have nothing to do with anything and for that matter, shes definitely not BUTCH! She did help while her hubby was in the white house and did alot for out country! Our economy was at a high point until this President got in there. Did you realize that she is a governer? How do you think she got to be governer if she had no qualifications? My vote is for Hilary Clinton, because she will have us back up and running in no time!
2007-11-26 04:34:41 · answer #7 · answered by enochsangel 4 · 4⤊ 6⤋
While I agree with several of your observations you may correctly ask why anyone qualifies to become president.
There is no test only the court of public opinion by vote which ultimately makes the decision.
Mrs. Clinton's dress is very unfeminine (how many pants suits are out there?) I believe she is trying to cover her fat thighs fro public view...that's her prerogative.
Her views seem closely controlled to reflect poll opinions which may be a mark of a duplicitous but potentially successful politician.
If she wins I at least wont be responsible
2007-11-26 04:39:12 · answer #8 · answered by gordem 2 · 6⤊ 4⤋
I concur. Also, I have asked in many a forum "What has she done for her constituency as a US Senator?" The answers range from her involvement in charitable organizations as First Lady to her being a driving force in the resurgence of the Democratic Party. No one can give an affirmative answer to the question. Also, as a Senator, she has a poor voting record, and now is campaigning against some of the very things she voted for as a Senator (most obvious is the war in Iraq). I have no problem with a woman candidate, or a New York candidate, or a Democrat - just not Billary.
2007-11-26 04:36:23 · answer #9 · answered by Mangy Coyote 5 · 4⤊ 7⤋
All you have done is list Sean Hannity's talking points against Hillary. The lesbian comment is a cheap shot and you completely ignored the 8 years she has spent in the Senate, many of those on the armed services committee. From a national security standpoint that makes her eminently more qualified than Bush was in 2000.
2007-11-26 04:43:50 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 6⤋
Hey Sparky - If you learned how to spell you might actually qualify for something.
Hillary is definitely qualified to run for President and personally I hope she wins.
2007-11-26 05:26:46 · answer #11 · answered by Domino 2 · 4⤊ 3⤋