Should English Dictionaries expand the definition of the word Bushwhacked???It seems an apropos political term

Question

Almost every action taken by the Government since 2001 can be explaned by the word Bushwhacked.

Answer 1

Actually, "Bushwhacked" is more correctly defined as what happens to people who "misunderestimate" Bush and his "strategery".

Ann Richards, Al Gore and John Kerry were all "bushwhacked", having lost their respective races against Bush, despite their condescending belief that they were better than he.

Answer 2

What you should bear in concepts is that there are a determination of obviously diverse / identifiable names for 'mens' politics, yet purely one for 'womens'. Liberals, Democrats, Marxists - it truly is basic to tell apart, very few human beings get wondered and say all politics is a lie because one is for this, and one is for that. in reality, there's a lot that feminism disagrees on - patriarchy being one in all those issues. it isn't that one is a feminist and the different isn't, it truly is basically that one seems for a individual rationalization and one seems for a social rationalization. it truly is fantastically a lot the very similar with civil rights - some trust that particular rights will ensure it, some imagine a touch extra is significant (affirmative action) - it isn't that they are no longer both antagonistic to racism, it truly is very nearly how they plan on fixing it. For a socialist feminist, the very incontrovertible reality that households (primary socialisation) are headed by older adult males instruments actually everyone as a lot as anticipate an similar element in society, employment, coaching, etc. I hate to sound like a stuck list, yet for this reason it truly is significant distinguish between the countless styles of feminism, as 'politics' and 'democracy' no extra clarify a persons'' stance than 'feminism'. At proper, it exhibits a established interest in equality, yet no longer a lot extra :-)

Answer 3

To answer your question, no, dictionaries should not expand the definition of a word until it is in general use among appropriate segments of the english speaking population.

Answer 4

Only if another could also be entered that has come to a great meaning.

Clinton Licked: in Bills case it's literal in Hillary's case it will be literal when she loses the election.

Answer 5

Why not? If we can have duh and d'o (Homer Simpson's line) we should have an extention of the meaning of bushwacked. It would, indeed, be appropriate. If used often enough they are usually included in the dictionary.

Answer 6

Interesting observation.

E.B. White once said that if a language is not flexible enough to "grow," it withers and dies.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E._B._White

Answer 7

Yes. Here is how it should be defined;

Bush-whacked: The syndrome characterized by an irrational hatred of George W. Bush. "These Liberals are Bush-whacked!"

See "Bush hate derangement syndrome."

Answer 8

Why not? It belongs just as much as getting a 'Lewinsky' does.