English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Would you suggest that i be a surrgogate mother for a couple who cant have a baby? I want to be a gastational surrogate...(the baby doesnt have any biologliocal ties to me. the Egg has already been fertilized by the parents and all i have to do is carry the baby....?
why or why not. And if you or anyone you know has done it, let me know what haapned and what it was like....

2007-11-26 00:59:58 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Pregnancy & Parenting Pregnancy

4 answers

In about 2-3 years I will be a surrogate for my cousin. I would imagine that it's going to be hard to give the baby to my cousin after I carried it for 9 months, so I decided to do it when I no longer wanted anymore. I'm on my third and final now, I DEFINITELY do not want anymore after this, I'm hoping this will make it easier.

If I still wanted more kids, than I definitely wouldn't do it.

2007-11-26 01:13:43 · answer #1 · answered by Mamma of 3 4 · 1 3

if i was close to the couple, i would absolutly do it. it would be hard though, to carry the baby for 9 months, then not raise it after but i think all in all, it would be the best gift to give someone.
Listen to you people, adopt adopt adopt. yah adoption is a great thing, but if these people can have a baby that is biologically theirs, then why the hell not. im sure if you were unable to carry a child, but someone else could do it for you, you would choose that over adoption. You have to put yourself in the shoes of the people that can not carry a child, they have all the right things to make a baby, just the oven is broke, (you know) im sure you would be greatfull to someone who would offer to help carry the child to term.

2007-11-26 09:06:34 · answer #2 · answered by louie 6 · 2 3

Why don't you encourage them to adopt a baby? There is no reason that they have to have a baby biologically related to them. Obviously, this has been impossible for them so far, and they should not take desperate and unethical means to make it possible.

If they love children and want one badly, they should show some compassion for the unwanted children that are already waiting for a home.

And if they can spend money on fertility treatments and surrogacy, they can definitely afford adoption.

2007-11-26 09:24:56 · answer #3 · answered by Knight of Malta 3 · 1 6

Many people believe that surrogacy is very unnatural. It would be one thing if you conceived a child naturally and then gave it up to this couple for adoption, but to let them put an embryo in your body which THEY created is unethical.

Just because something is scientifically possible does not make it right.

When a couple cannot carry a child to term then they should accept with humility that a biological child is not within their grasp, and they should start looking for a child to adopt (there are thousands of them longing for parents!).

It's wonderful that you want to help them have a baby so why don't you encourage them in their adoption efforts?

2007-11-26 09:16:32 · answer #4 · answered by Veritas 7 · 2 7

fedest.com, questions and answers