...would you accept a "Hula Hoop" as an engagement ring?
(I mean...hey! Those things aren't cheap, ya' know...and we can both wear it at the same time...together...hips a' gyratin'...
pets a' scramblin' for safety...very romantic...)
2007-11-26 00:00:24 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
You're in love and your health... Now that's what I call being rich!!!!
2007-11-26 00:11:02 · answer #1 · answered by Bobyi P 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Lol.
No.
Too outdated,
What is it saying between the lines ?
"This is the size of your finger. Only a hulahoop can fit it, you are chubby, opps no, gigantically fat"
Lol. I am sure you will end up girlfriendless in no time at all.
2007-11-26 08:11:08 · answer #2 · answered by QuiteNewHere 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Sorry your not my type, but I'll still take the Hula hoop if its encased in gold.
2007-11-26 08:08:15 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
hahaha, your so funny POCKET. if you are both deeply in love, you will find ways to make your life better and happy
2007-11-26 08:13:03 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yeah but a bubble gum ring is cheaper =]
2007-11-26 08:05:15 · answer #5 · answered by Aubri's Mommie 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Ring wouldn't have mattered then.
2007-11-26 08:11:12 · answer #6 · answered by bionic man 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, sorry,woman cannot live on love alone. I've tried that.
2007-11-26 08:04:24 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'd prefer a rubberband.
2007-11-26 08:04:48 · answer #8 · answered by Mo 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
that would be fine with me, at least i probably wouldn't loose it
2007-11-26 08:30:29 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
yes i would......how romantic..and what are you talking about i am dirt poor!
2007-11-26 09:37:53 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋