British.
I think Giulliani will win, Clinton cannot defend herself; the fact that's she would be deficient as a leader of such a superpower doesn't seem to have immediately registered with the American people. I'd prefer McCain (a Republican candidate) to win over anyone, but Giulliani will be nominated and will repel the impotent Democrat onslaught with remarkable ease. Giulliani, and McCain especially do not pander to anyone and are best equipped to control the nation; with the necessary expertise to lead the country on a world stage as well.
2007-11-26 07:14:22
·
answer #1
·
answered by second only to trollalalala 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
well i hope like hell Clinton doesnt win (i love this country and dont want to have to leave..which i may if that communist witch wins) other than that i believe a Romney ,Jullianni ticket has the best shot at winning. .Either as president with the other as vice-president . Romney has the right fiscal policies and core values to appeal to the conservative voters and Jullianni has the more liberal social ideas that will appeal to the swing voters that are critical in this upcoming election. Both Ruddy and Mitt have proven strong leadership qualities while (unless you count being first lady...which only an idiot would count) Clinton has a history of following the ebb and flow of popular opinion rather than leading that opinion in the direction of her core beliefs (which if she stated clearly , would scare the hell out of most Americans)
That is my opinion for what it's worth.Lets just hope someone keeps that shrew out of office.
Further for all you folks with problems with the U S being in Iraq : 1) We had a legitamate reason to go there
( a valid warrent to search based on intelligence)
2) We did not have a reason to stay
(if the cops kick down my door to look around with a warrant , they cant stay and rearrange the furniture)
3) Most of us want out we just dont feel that leaving that country in disarry is the way to do it
4)Whomever is elected will have exiting Iraq as a priority (both parties ...all candidates
2007-11-25 23:32:46
·
answer #2
·
answered by stvc1961 2
·
3⤊
0⤋
Like a lot of Brits I cannot understand how Bush ever got elected...although if I remember it was all a bit dodgy in Chicago!.However it seems that religion is the key area in US politics. If you get the so called "religious right wing" on side as the Republicans have done so well then you will probably win!Religion plays almost no role in UK politics. From where I sit, it seems as if the right use fear as the weapon to win votes(enemy at the door etc etc)...Rudy Giuliani, among others, seem to do that effectivley.
The Democrats seem unable to win the votes.even though from my viewpoint they have the better policies..although eitherway I dont think the US is ready for either its first black or woman president, which seems very backward looking. I for one would prefer a Democrat to win
2007-11-26 00:03:16
·
answer #3
·
answered by cheekybear 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
Surveys do save on with a crooked line so i'm making a wager on Michelle Bachmenn to take the Iowa through marvel. The institution types won't harm out with electing a RINO this time around. McCain replaced into the final maverick.
2016-10-18 04:02:16
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Democratic Nominee.
2007-11-25 23:43:20
·
answer #5
·
answered by fatsausage 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Hillary Clinton has the intelligence and experience to be a good President.
VOTE for your choice as US President on my 360 degrees blog and know who will likely win.
2007-11-26 00:43:41
·
answer #6
·
answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Ron Paul for both want and think will win. Oh U.S.A. Citizen hear. Ron Paul would like to close many of our military bases abroud, pull us out of the war, repeal the patriot act. Good stuff you know . He is against starting pre-emptive wars and some of Us still think thats a REALLY BAD idea .Check him out if you feel inclined. He voted against The War in Iraq at the beginning. He is a republican .
http://www.ronpaul2008.com/issues/
I am curious to see what people in other countries think of Ron Paul being that are media doesnt ever hardly mention him.
2007-11-25 23:24:15
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
Well I thought I was in with a great chance until I saw the lastest polls. I am, not even mentioned! I sent my $19.99 off to the address in the advert and it gauranteed at least a 10,000 votes. The worst of it is that I think I would have been a great president, I fit all the requirements: I am not very cleva, I can't spel, I don't like foreigners (unless they have something I want like oil, then we can be buddys - until the oil runs out anyway), the one thing I am really good at is that I lie brilliantly - and I really care about the people - oh and I lie brilliantly.
2007-11-25 23:07:41
·
answer #8
·
answered by Alex 3
·
3⤊
4⤋
Another - not so bright - person. (plenty of them are in the race)
It is time the US changes its system to allow the best people to be empowered instead of the richest or the most influencials.
Failure to do so will be negative for the US and the rest of the democratic world.
2007-11-25 23:05:11
·
answer #9
·
answered by NLBNLB 6
·
3⤊
1⤋
Absolutely agree with John R.The Bilderberg decide!
2007-11-25 23:07:14
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
1⤋