English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

but they will still have Amarie Stoudiemire

2007-11-25 20:34:26 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports Basketball

11 answers

Steve Nash controls the tempo and the offense of the Suns. Without him, the Suns are a wreck.

2007-11-26 02:54:13 · answer #1 · answered by mirrormask 1 · 0 0

Shawn Marion is good, but Steve Nash is the one who carries the Suns. Just look at the comparison:
Suns in 2003-2004, without Steve Nash: 29-53
Suns in 2004-2005, obtained Steve Nash: 62-20!

2007-11-26 13:41:45 · answer #2 · answered by jdharb9 3 · 0 0

Losing Shawn Marion would be alot worse than losing Nash. Marion does everything he scores, rebounds, passes and actually plays defense whereas Steve Nash has never played defense in his life. If he played any the Suns would have won a championship by now even with the refs cheating for the boring SPURS.

2007-11-26 16:43:04 · answer #3 · answered by dw3 1 · 0 0

I don't think they would be that bad. They would have Amare Stoudemire and Leandro Barbosa. But they wouldn't be the same Phoenix Suns without Steve Nash and Shawn Marion.

2007-11-26 10:30:48 · answer #4 · answered by Antwuan (Giants Superbowl XLVI Champs!!!) 7 · 0 0

Only if Grant Hill returns to his old form, otherwise i can't imagine how bad the suns will be because Steve Nash is Suns' Heart and Soul. Remember a couple of years ago when Stephon Marbury was the PG of the Suns? Compare those records and it says all.

2007-11-26 08:30:40 · answer #5 · answered by Rico 2 · 0 0

without steve whos gonna give amare the ball down low it doesent matter if matrix is there or not even through he is a 20-10 guy but the suns main player is nash and it shows through his mvp's if nash wasent there shawn and amare would just be stars not superstars

hope that helps

2007-11-26 04:47:10 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Even if you just took Steve Nash away the team wouldn't be the same high wins as normal

2007-11-26 06:35:59 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

They obviously wouldn't be 11-2 right now if they didn't have those two, but they have Barbosa to take over as PG. Marion can't be replaced, though. Nobody in the league is as good as he is at defending all positions.

2007-11-26 05:37:07 · answer #8 · answered by Flying Fish Nugget 3 · 0 0

losing nash will hurt them alot more than losing marion. amare, as good as he is, can't create his own shot from a standing start. unless they can change their strategy or find a suitable nash replacement, they'll probably lose 20 more games.

2007-11-26 07:50:02 · answer #9 · answered by m33p0 5 · 0 0

I do Reckon that, Amare is good but come on! hes not gonna be taking the ball up, you need a Point Guard!!!

2007-11-26 14:43:27 · answer #10 · answered by Dino K 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers