English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I've heard the complaint on both sides that the front runners for both parties do not represent many of their supporters on a number of issues. Do you truly believe that any of the options available will leave you feeling like your best interests were at heart during their term in office or are you just going to pick the one who seems the least distasteful?

2007-11-25 18:59:59 · 8 answers · asked by kfinn360 2 in Politics & Government Politics

8 answers

I had the perfect candidate, but CNN, GE, and the other SatanCorps censored him.

2007-11-25 19:06:07 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

I would gladly throw out the red carpet for Rudy's entry into the WH. I lived in the NY area both before his mayorship and just a few years later, during it. He made an amazing difference and that is something that I have rarely, if ever, seen a politician actually do.

Otherwise, I will vote for any one BUT Hillary and be happy to do it. We have a lot of good candidates on our side. Paul is the only one that I wish would just go away.

2007-11-26 03:23:41 · answer #2 · answered by wider scope 7 · 3 3

I'm a strong supporter of Mike Huckabee, and I'm voting for him because I can relate to him. He's a southern guy, a Baptist minister, and has strong convictions. I also love his plan to get rid of the IRS and institute a "Fair Tax".

Voted for the "lesser of the two evils" in 2004, I sure hope I don't have to do that again.

2007-11-26 03:06:26 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

It all depends on who is nominated. If the Nov 08 choice is between the two current front runners, Hillary Clinton and Rudy Giuliani, then I will vote for Hillary, not because she is "less evil" but because the war-mongering Giuliani is.

Pat Buchanan -- Is a vote for Rudy a vote for war?
http://news.yahoo.com/s/uc/20071109/cm_uc_crpbux/op_334349

2007-11-26 03:13:08 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

The best that I can hope for is a lesser evil.

However, I think Romney might be the one with the best economic plan.

Bottom line for me is ANYBODY but Hillary. I mean ANYBODY!

2007-11-26 03:05:54 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

the PRIMARIES have not even started yet--first one is Jan 8th, so we will not know probably until after Super Tuesday in mid Feb, 2008 who the CANDIDATES are, and it probably won't be until after the summer conventions that we know who their running mates will be. Then we can answer your question (HOLDING NOSE as I go to vote in my primary)

2007-11-26 03:21:19 · answer #6 · answered by Mike 7 · 1 2

The less of evils.

Thats all we can really do.

Remember, polititians put themselves first, not you. They are out for their own personal gain and that of their partners' first.

Wish I had a better answer for you.

2007-11-26 03:05:13 · answer #7 · answered by The prophet of DOOM 5 · 5 1

hillary clinton.

2007-11-26 03:05:39 · answer #8 · answered by moderation 2 · 1 4

fedest.com, questions and answers